Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002;20(3):235-52.
doi: 10.1002/bsl.484.

The role of proxies in treatment decisions: evaluating functional capacity to consent to end-of-life treatments within a family context

Affiliations
Review

The role of proxies in treatment decisions: evaluating functional capacity to consent to end-of-life treatments within a family context

Rebecca S Allen et al. Behav Sci Law. 2002.

Abstract

Psychology as a profession has entered the arena of palliative and hospice care later in the process than other health care professions. Through the use of Familial Advance Planning Evaluations (FAPEs), however, psychologists can assist individuals and families in facing end-of-life transitions in important ways. Hospice and palliative care philosophy treats the patient and family as the unit of care. End-of-life decision-making is therefore a family matter as well as a normative developmental transition. Yet, little is known about the decision-making process. This paper reviews the literature regarding informed consent, advance care planning, and proxy decision-making and outlines a theoretical model for familial decision-making. Previous models of end-of-life capacity evaluations and family assessments are presented and serve as the basis for a comprehensive assessment of familial decision-making at the end of life. Functional capacity evaluations of individuals at the end of life regarding decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments enable both the individual patient and one identified proxy from his or her family to discuss important issues families may face during medical crises at the end of life. The information gleaned from such evaluations has the potential to assist psychologists and other professionals in designing family-specific interventions to reduce caregiving distress, improve quality of life for dying patients, and ease the transition to bereavement for caregivers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alabama Act 97, 187 Amendments to the Alabama Natural Death (Living Will) Act (1997).

    1. Allen RS. Care integration team intervention during hospice care. Washington, DC: National Institute on Aging; 1999. Principal Investigator. NIH Grant No K01AG00943.
    1. Allen-Burge R, Burgio LD, Bourgeois M, Sims R, Nunnikhoven J. Increasing communication among nursing home residents. Journal of Clinical Geropsychology. 2001;7:213–230.
    1. Allen-Burge R, Haley WE. Individual differences and surrogate medical decisions: Differing preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Aging and Mental Health. 1997;1:121–131.
    1. American Psychological Association (APA) Report to the Board of Directors from the APA Working Group on Assisted Suicide and End-of-Life Decisions. Washington, DC: Author; 2000.

Publication types

MeSH terms