Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures
- PMID: 12113413
- PMCID: PMC3043409
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures
Abstract
Objective: To report our first cases of laparoscopic sacropexy and assess the feasibility and short-term complications.
Methods: We retrospectively studied 77 laparoscopic sacral colpopexies performed from June 1996 to May 1998. Suspension was reinforced with 2 strips of synthetic mesh. Five patients had previously undergone hysterectomy, and 4 others had experienced failure of surgery for prolapse of the uterus.
Results: Laparoscopy was performed in 83 women with symptomatic prolapse of the uterus. Six cases required conversion to laparotomy because of technical difficulties. All of the remaining 77 patients underwent laparoscopic sacropexy that included anterior and posterior mesh reinforcement. Subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed in 60 cases, laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in 74, and levator myorrhaphy via a vaginal approach in 55. Operative time decreased from 292 to 180 minutes as experience was gained. The main operative complications were 1 rectal and 2 bladder injuries. Three patients required reoperations for hematoma or hemorrhage. One patient complained of chronic inflammation of the cervix, and another experienced rejection of the posterior mesh 6 months after the operation. Mean follow-up was 343 days. Three other patients required reoperation, 1 for a third-degree cystocele and 2 for recurrent stress incontinence.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is feasible. Operative time and postoperative complications are related to the surgeon's experience but remain comparable to those noted in laparotomy. Long-term assessment is required to confirm the results of this procedure.
Similar articles
-
[Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000 Dec;29(8):746-750. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000. PMID: 11139710 French.
-
What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 25. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26408228
-
Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse.Urol Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;28(1):151-7. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(01)80017-3. Urol Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11277060
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
Surgical management of uterine prolapse.Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):493-507. Minerva Ginecol. 2008. PMID: 18981977 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site utero-sacral ligament suspension for apical vaginal prolapse: evaluation of our technique and perioperative outcomes.J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):171-177. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0638-0. Epub 2016 Sep 8. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27631421
-
Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):827-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0537-z. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. PMID: 18183341
-
Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy with the da Vinci(®) surgical system.J Robot Surg. 2009 Mar;3(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0125-y. Epub 2009 Feb 20. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27628451
-
Comparison of first versus second line sacrocolpopexies in terms of morbidity and mid-term efficacy.Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 29;12(1):16283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20127-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36175515 Free PMC article.
-
[Prolapse surgery].Urologe A. 2005 Mar;44(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-005-0797-5. Urologe A. 2005. PMID: 15747034 German.
References
-
- Hardiman PJ, Drutz HP. Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:612–616 - PubMed
-
- Lefranc JP, Blondon J. Chirurgie des prolapsus genitaux par voie abdominale. J Chir. 1983;120:431–436 - PubMed
-
- Spennacchio M, Buonaguidi A, Bertola E, Guareschi, Vignali M. Abdominal sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective study. J Gynecol Surg. 1997;13:77
-
- Querleu D. Techniques Chirurgicales en Gynecologie. 2nd edition Paris: Masson;1998
-
- Villet R, Van den akker, Salet-Lizee D, Bastide N. Cure de prolapsus par voie abdominale à l'aide d'un treillis de Vicryl composite. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1995;24:717–721 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical