Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):143-7.

Primary thoracoscopic evaluation of pleural effusion with local anesthesia: an alternative approach

Affiliations

Primary thoracoscopic evaluation of pleural effusion with local anesthesia: an alternative approach

Sadir J Alrawi et al. JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The development of a thoracoscopically assisted technique to be performed with the patient under local anesthesia for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes when treating pleural effusions and empyemas in high-risk surgical patients.

Methods: Twenty patients with pleural effusion or empyema who were also determined to be at high risk for complications following a thoracotomy, pleural biopsy, general anesthesia, or all of these, underwent placement of a thoracoscope while under local anesthesia followed by thoracic fluid drainage, pleural biopsy, and pleurodesis as required. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for a variety of factors including personal history, pre-existing medical conditions, and pre- and postoperative course.

Results: The average age of the patients was 59 years (18 to 89) with a 55% male/45% female sex distribution. Patients had this procedure as a consequence of malignancy (50%), empyema (30%), spontaneous pneumothorax (10%), bronchiectasis (50%), or heart failure (5%). The average duration of the procedure was 62 minutes (20 to 190), with an average of 861 mL of fluid drainage, and 114 mL of estimated blood loss. The tube thoracostomy was usually removed on the sixth (0 to 13) postprocedure day. This procedure was well tolerated by the patients with the majority of pain management being achieved with patient controlled analgesia (58%). The direct complication rate was 10%, with 2 patients requiring endotracheal intubation.

Conclusion: This novel thoracoscopic procedure represents an acceptable alternative to the traditional treatment of pleural effusions and empyema with comparable outcome parameters and morbidity. This technique may eventually become the standard of care for the treatment of pleural effusions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Equipment: (1) suture material, (2) talcum powder, (3) 10-mm trocar with obturator, (4) scalpel, (5) right-angle telescope (0 degree), (6) dissector with diathermy, (7) dissector with diathermy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Thoracoscopy with video recorder: Complete evaluation of the pleural cavity is possible. The lung is retracted for parietal and visceral pleural biopsies. Lysis of adhesions and lung biopsies could be easily illustrated on the video screen.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The patient is in the supine position, and the procedure performed with the patient under local anesthesia without intubation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobaeus HC. Uber lapro-und thorakoskopie. Beitr Klin Tuberk. 1912;25:334–341
    1. Hau T, Forster E, Gandawidjaja L, Heemken R. Thoracoscopic pulmonary surgery: indications and results. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:23–28 - PubMed
    1. Saenz NC, Conlon KCP, Aronson DA, LaQuaglia MP. The application of malignancies. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech. 1997;7(5):110–117 - PubMed
    1. Matthay RA, Coppage L, Shaw C, Fielderman AE. Malignancies metastatic to the pleura. Inves Radiol. 1990;25:601–619 - PubMed
    1. Lynch TE. Management of malignant pleural effusion. Chest. 1993;103:385S–389S - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources