Electromagnetic fields: human safety issues
- PMID: 12117757
- DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.020702.153447
Electromagnetic fields: human safety issues
Abstract
Most of the recently revised safety standards worldwide are set in terms of internal rates of electromagnetic energy deposition (specific absorption rates or SAR) at radio frequencies (RF) and microwave frequencies, and of induced electric fields or current densities at lower frequencies up to 10 MHz. Numerical methods have been developed that use millimeter resolution anatomically based models of the human body to determine SAR or the induced electric fields and current densities for real-life EM exposure conditions. A popular method for use at RF and microwave frequencies is the finite-difference time-domain method. This method is described and illustrated for SAR distributions due to cellular telephones for head models based on human anatomy. A method often used for calculations of induced electric fields and current densities at low frequencies is the impedance method. Use of this method is illustrated by an example of an electronic article surveillance (EAS) system for anatomic models of an adult and 10- and 5-year-old children. Experimental phantoms using a fluid to simulate the dielectric properties of the brain may be used for determination of peak 1- or 10-g SAR needed for compliance with the various safety standards.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of various safety guidelines for electronic article surveillance devices with pulsed magnetic fields.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Jan;50(1):107-13. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2002.807318. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003. PMID: 12617530
-
Comparison of radio frequency energy absorption in ear and eye region of children and adults at 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz.Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 21;50(18):4355-69. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/008. Epub 2005 Sep 7. Phys Med Biol. 2005. PMID: 16148398
-
FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 7;51(9):2339-52. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/9/016. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Phys Med Biol. 2006. PMID: 16625046
-
[Immunotropic effects of electromagnetic fields in the range of radio- and microwave frequencies].Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2001 Nov;11(65):447-51. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2001. PMID: 11852821 Review. Polish.
-
Radio frequency electromagnetic exposure: tutorial review on experimental dosimetry.Bioelectromagnetics. 1996;17(3):195-208. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:3<195::AID-BEM5>3.0.CO;2-Z. Bioelectromagnetics. 1996. PMID: 8809359 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19833552 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Excessive smartphone use increases self-reported auditory and vestibular symptoms.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2025 Aug;137(15-16):520-526. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02418-1. Epub 2024 Aug 23. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2025. PMID: 39177753 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.Dose Response. 2013;11(1):82-98. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.11-048.Mothersill. Epub 2012 Jan 20. Dose Response. 2013. PMID: 23550268 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Different Nanomaterials Additions in Clay-Based Composites on Electromagnetic Transmission.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;15(15):5115. doi: 10.3390/ma15155115. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35897547 Free PMC article.
-
A role for bioelectric effects in the induction of bystander signals by ionizing radiation?Dose Response. 2007 Apr 3;5(3):214-29. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.06-011.Mothersill. Dose Response. 2007. PMID: 18648606 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous