Range of motion training in brace vs. plaster immobilization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized comparison with a 2-year follow-up
- PMID: 12121424
- DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.120203.x
Range of motion training in brace vs. plaster immobilization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized comparison with a 2-year follow-up
Abstract
The purpose of this prospective and randomized study was to compare rehabilitation with early range of motion (ROM) training vs immobilization following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty patients, undergoing an ACL reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, were postoperatively allocated randomly to either a plaster cast or a brace for 5 weeks. The brace group had ROM exercises from postoperative day 7. The commencement of ROM exercises was postponed 4 weeks for the plaster group compared to the brace group, but progressed subsequently with equal speed. There was no difference between the groups in the ROM of flexion or extension 20 weeks after the ACL reconstruction and later. Twenty-four months after surgery, the muscle strength deficit in the hamstring muscles (isokinetic measurements; percent difference, injured vs uninjured) was significantly larger in the brace group (mean +/- SD: 5.9 +/- 7.8%, P < 0.01) than in the plaster group (- 0.9 +/- 11.8%, NS) (brace vs plaster group, P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was also a tendency in the brace group to a larger strength deficit in the quadriceps muscle (brace: 11.1 +/- 13.2%, P < 0.001; plaster: 3.8 +/- 12.9%, NS) (brace vs plaster group, P= 0.07). There was no difference between the groups in the total sagittal knee laxity, as measured with an arthrometer, or in the subjective knee function or activity level (Lysholm score together with the Tegner activity level) between the groups. It is concluded that the postoperative treatment with early range of motion training after ACL reconstruction gave as good ROM, knee stability, subjective knee function and activity level as the treatment with immobilization. It is hypothesized that the larger strength deficit observed after rehabilitation with early range of motion training is secondary to the more intensive training and physical therapist involvement that was demanded in order to achieve full ROM following immobilization.
Similar articles
-
Can a post-operative brace in slight hyperextension prevent extension deficit after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomised study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Sep;11(5):318-21. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0406-3. Epub 2003 Jul 26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003. PMID: 12897981 Clinical Trial.
-
Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(3):157-61. doi: 10.1007/s001670050044. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997. PMID: 9335027
-
Early versus late start of open kinetic chain quadriceps exercises after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring grafts: a prospective randomized outcome study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Apr;15(4):402-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0246-z. Epub 2007 Jan 12. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007. PMID: 17219226 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Knee Surg. 2019 Aug;32(8):770-787. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669916. Epub 2018 Sep 13. J Knee Surg. 2019. PMID: 30212919
-
The effect of knee bracing on the knee function and stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31279767
Cited by
-
Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):2325967113518305. doi: 10.1177/2325967113518305. eCollection 2014 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 26535266 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiographic and Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis 32 to 37 Years After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2387-2394. doi: 10.1177/0363546520939897. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32736511 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Aug;18(8):1128-44. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1027-2. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010. PMID: 20069277
-
Knee kinematics and kinetics in former soccer players with a 16-year-old ACL injury--the effects of twelve weeks of knee-specific training.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Apr 17;8:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-35. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007. PMID: 17439651 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Rehabilitation Predictors of Clinical Outcome Following Revision ACL Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 May 1;101(9):779-786. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00397. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019. PMID: 31045665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous