Effect of day and night temperature on internode and stem length in chrysanthemum: is everything explained by DIF?
- PMID: 12125764
- PMCID: PMC4233858
- DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf154
Effect of day and night temperature on internode and stem length in chrysanthemum: is everything explained by DIF?
Abstract
In many plant species, including chrysanthemum, a strong positive correlation between internode length and DIF [difference between day (DT) and night (NT) temperature] has been observed. However, Langton and Cockshull (1997. Scientia Horticulturae 69: 229-237) reported no such relationship and showed that absolute DT and NT explained internode length rather than DIF. To investigate these conflicting results and to clarify the validity of the DIF concept, cut chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum 'Reagan Improved') were grown in growth chambers at all 16 combinations of four DT and four NT (16, 20, 24 and 28 degrees C) with a 12 h day length. Length of internode 10, number of internodes and stem length were measured on days 5, 10, 17, 22 and 27 after starting the temperature treatments. Internode length on day 10 showed a positive linear relationship with DIF (R2 = 0.64). However, when internodes had reached their final length in all treatments (day 27), a much stronger positive linear relation was observed (R2 = 0.81). A model to predict final internode length was developed based on the absolute DT and NT responses: both responses were optimum curves and no significant interaction between DT and NT occurred [final internode length (mm) = -32.23 + 3.56DT + 1.08NT - 0.0687DT2 - 0.0371NT2; R2 = 0.91, where TD is day temperature and TN is night temperature]. It is shown that DIF can predict final internode length only within a temperature range where effects of DT and NT are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign (18-24 degrees C). Internode appearance rate, as well as stem length formed during the experiment, showed an optimum response to DT.
Figures






References
-
- BertramL, Karlsen P.1994. Patterns in stem elongation rate in chrysanthemum and tomato plants in relation to irradiance and day/night temperature. Scientia Horticulturae 58: 139–150.
-
- CarvalhoSMP, Heuvelink E.2001. Influence of greenhouse climate and plant density on external quality of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura): First steps towards a quality model. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 76: 249–258.
-
- ChallaH, Heuvelink E, van Meeteren U.1995. Crop growth and development. In: Bakker JC, Bot GPA, Challa H, van de Braak NJ, eds. Greenhouse climate control: an integrated approach Wageningen: Wageningen Pers, 62–84.
-
- CockshullKE, Langton FA, Cave CRJ.1995. Differential effects of different DIF treatments on chrysanthemum and poinsettia. Acta Horticulturae 378: 15–25.
-
- ErwinJE, Heins RD.1995. Thermomorphogenic responses in stem and leaf development. HortScience 30: 940–949.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases