Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG
- PMID: 12131721
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00018
Pedicle screws with high electrical resistance: a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG
Abstract
Study design: Clinically relevant aspects of pedicle screws were subjected to electrical resistance testing.
Objectives: To catalog commonly used pedicle screws in terms of electrical resistance, and to determine whether polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential to create a high-resistance circuit during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing.
Summary of background data: Although stimulus-evoked electromyography is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, no studies have documented the electrical resistance of commonly used pedicle screws.
Methods: Resistance measurements were obtained from eight pedicle screw varieties (5 screws of each type) across the screw shank and between the shank and regions of the screw that would be clinically accessible to stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing with a screw implanted in a pedicle. To determine measurement variability, resistance was measured three times at each site and with the crown of the polyaxial-type screw in three random positions.
Results: Resistance across the screw shank ranged from 0 to 36.4 ohms, whereas resistance across the length of the monoaxial-type screws ranged from 0.1 to 31.8 ohms. Resistance between the hexagonal port and shank of polyaxial-type screws ranged from 0 to 25 ohms. In contrast, resistance between the mobile crown and shank of polyaxial-type screws varied widely, ranging from 0.1 ohms to an open circuit (no electrical conduction). Polyaxial-type screws demonstrated an open circuit in 28 of 75 measurements (37%) and a high-resistance circuit (exceeding 1000 ohms) in 5 of 75 measurements (7%).
Conclusions: Polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance between the mobile crown and shank, and therefore may fail to demonstrate an electromyographic response during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing in the setting of a pedicle breech. To avoid false-negative stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing, the cathode stimulator probe should be applied to the hexagonal port or directly to the screw shank, and not to the mobile crown.
Similar articles
-
Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jul;47(4):352-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.114915. Indian J Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23960278 Free PMC article.
-
Considering Pedicle Screw Resistance in Electromyography of the Spine.Oper Neurosurg. 2020 Dec 15;20(1):69-73. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa271. Oper Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32895700
-
Intraoperative neuromonitoring: can the results of direct stimulation of titanium-alloy pedicle screws in the thoracic spine be trusted?J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Dec;29(6):502-8. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182767aac. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012. PMID: 23207589
-
Stimulus-Evoked Electromyographic Monitoring During Minimally Invasive Transpedicular Implantation of Screws in Lumbosacral Spine: Threshold Value, Methodology and Clinical Effectiveness.World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.122. Epub 2016 Oct 31. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27810457 Review.
-
Current trends in pedicle screw stimulation techniques: lumbosacral, thoracic, and cervical levels.Neurodiagn J. 2012 Jun;52(2):100-75. Neurodiagn J. 2012. PMID: 22808751 Review.
Cited by
-
Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jul;47(4):352-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.114915. Indian J Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23960278 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative triggered electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw efficiently reduces the lumbar pedicle breach and re-operative rate-a retrospective analysis based on postoperative computed tomography scan.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 30;24(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06658-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 37386387 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches.Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Jun;42(2):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8. Neurosurg Rev. 2019. PMID: 29313181 Review.
-
Evaluation of the intrinsic properties of pedicle screws: do diameter, manufacturing and screw design affect resistance and/or resistivity.Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009 Oct;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S77-S82. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2009.2767. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2009. PMID: 19912122 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during complex spinal deformity cases in pediatric patients: methodology, utility, prognostication, and outcome.Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Apr;26(4):523-44. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1115-0. Epub 2010 Mar 7. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010. PMID: 20213189
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials