Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane
- PMID: 12132561
- DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1344
Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion (TCI) versus a standard regimen using desflurane for anesthesia maintenance was analyzed. This observational study consisted of 100 inpatients 18 to 75 years old with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I or II who were scheduled for otological surgery lasting less than four hours. Patients received one of two treatments. The desflurane-maintenance group received propofol 2-4 mg/kg and sufentanil 0.15-0.30 microg (as the citrate)/kg. A constant fresh gas flow of 1 L/min was used during maintenance of anesthesia. The propofol-maintenance group received TCI propofol and an additional infusion of sufentanil. Anesthesia was induced with 0.15-0.30 microg/kg. One blinded evaluator assessed the postoperative recovery from anesthesia for all patients. The cost of drugs and medical devices used during the intraoperative and postoperative periods was calculated. Effectiveness was defined as the absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), while the cost-effectiveness of each procedure was the cost per PONV-free episode. The efficiency of each procedure represented the production of effectiveness per dollar invested. Chi-square and t tests, sensitivity analysis, and logistic regression were also performed. The only intergroup difference detected was the frequency of PONV occurring in the early recovery phase (11 in the desflurane group versus 2 in the propofol group). Of those patients requiring antiemetic rescue, 9 were in the desflurane group and only 2 were in the propofol group (p < 0.05). The TCI propofol regimen was more expensive than the desflurane regimen ($45 versus $28 per patient, respectively) (p < 0.001). The differential cost-effectiveness ratio was $94.7 per PONV-free episode. PONV 24 hours after surgery and patient satisfaction were similar between groups. A standard regimen of desflurane was more cost-effective than TCI propofol for anesthesia maintenance in achieving PONV-free episodes.
Similar articles
-
Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00015. Anesth Analg. 1999. Retraction in: Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1238. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821a9a67. PMID: 9895070 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
-
[Pharmacoeconomical model for cost calculation using a study on prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative phase as an example. Cost effectiveness analysis of a tropisetron supplemented desflurane anaesthesia in comparison to a propofol total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)].Anaesthesist. 2002 Jun;51(6):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0325-6. Anaesthesist. 2002. PMID: 12391535 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jan;42(1):106-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05089.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998. PMID: 9527731 Clinical Trial.
-
Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0632-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018. PMID: 30409186 Free PMC article.
-
Which anaesthetic agents are cost-effective in day surgery? Literature review, national survey of practice and randomised controlled trial.Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(30):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta6300. Health Technol Assess. 2002. PMID: 12709296 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil with propofol or desflurane under bispectral index guidance: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.J Res Med Sci. 2011 May;16(5):611-20. J Res Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 22091283 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of Intravenous Anesthesia Using a Target-controlled Infusion System with Local Anesthesia in Submuscular Breast Augmentation Surgery.Arch Plast Surg. 2012 Sep;39(5):540-5. doi: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.5.540. Epub 2012 Sep 12. Arch Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 23094252 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of anesthesia-controlled operating room time after propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9805. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009805. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29384881 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing Reduction Mammaplasty Surgery: Advancements and Outcomes with Tumescent Local Anaesthesia.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(6):1708-1714. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04412-4. Epub 2024 Sep 29. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 39342541 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of intraoperative intravenous crystalloid infusion on post-operative nausea and vomiting after diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy: Comparison of 30 ml/kg and 10 ml/kg and to report the effect of the menstrual cycle on the incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting.Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):100-4. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114013. Anesth Essays Res. 2013. PMID: 25885729 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources