A novel filling technique for packable composite resin in Class II restorations
- PMID: 12132569
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00515.x
A novel filling technique for packable composite resin in Class II restorations
Abstract
The use of composite resin restorations in posterior teeth has increased considerably in the past few years. Specific composite resins for posterior teeth, as well as new operative techniques, have been developed to overcome some clinical difficulties. The present article describes a new technique to reconstitute the interproximal contour and contact of Class II restorations using a packable composite resin. Two lower first molars from the same patient are reported in detail, illustrating the technique step by step. The technique indicates the use of a metallic matrix band and wood wedges to provide an interproximal contour and contact with the adjacent tooth as well as to provide an adequate cervical adaptation. The first increment of the packable composite resin is applied on the gingival wall of the proximal box, packed cervically near the axial wall and, automatically, the resin climbs up in contact with the inner surface of the matrix band. This increment is sculpted and light-cured and the metallic matrix band is removed. Thus, the Class II cavities are transformed into Class I, with free access for light-curing. Small incremental layers of composite fill the remaining cavities. This technique is faster than conventional techniques and permits appropriate embrasure, better contour, and contact points.
Clinical significance: Packable composite resins present primarily new handling characteristics that permit the development of novel filling techniques. The technique proposed in this article allows easier Class II buildup, with proper proximal contact and proximal smooth surfaces, once there are no irregularities among the composite increments. Another advantage is that there is adequate light exposure for polymerization, because the metal matrix can be removed during the restorative procedure.
Similar articles
-
Using packable composites for direct posterior placement.J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Aug;132(8):1099-104. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0334. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001. PMID: 11575016
-
Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):97-105. doi: 10.2341/04-194. Oper Dent. 2006. PMID: 16536200
-
Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1581-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0103. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003. PMID: 14719754 Clinical Trial.
-
Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.Dent Clin North Am. 1990 Jan;34(1):27-44. Dent Clin North Am. 1990. PMID: 2403943 Review.
-
An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Oct;133(10):1387-98. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002. PMID: 12403542 Review.
Cited by
-
Depth of cure and mechanical properties of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation.Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Oct;16(5):1425-34. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0647-3. Epub 2011 Dec 2. Clin Oral Investig. 2012. PMID: 22134667
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous