Top-down gain control in the auditory system: evidence from identification and discrimination experiments
- PMID: 12132761
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03194729
Top-down gain control in the auditory system: evidence from identification and discrimination experiments
Abstract
The influence of intensity range in auditory identification and intensity discrimination experiments is well documented and is usually attributed to nonsensory factors. Recent studies, however, have suggested that the stimulus range effect might be sensory in origin. To test this notion, in one set of experiments, we had listeners identify the individual tones in a set. One baseline condition consisted of identifying four 1-kHz, low-intensity tones; the other consisted of identifying four 1-kHz, high-intensity tones. In the experimental conditions, these baseline tone sets were augmented by adding a fifth tone at either 1 or 5 kHz. Added 5-kHz tones had little effect on identification accuracy for the four baseline tones. When an added 1-kHz tone differed substantially in intensity from the four baseline tones, it adversely affected performance, with the addition of a high-intensity tone to a set of low-intensity tones having a more deleterious effect than the addition of a low-intensity tone to a set of high-intensity tones. These and further results, obtained in an exploration of this asymmetrical range effect in a third identification experiment and in two intensity-discrimination experiments, were consistent with the notion of a nonlinear amplifier under top-down control whose functions include protection against sensory overload from loud sounds. The identification data were well described by a signal-detection model using equal-variance Laplace distributions instead of the usual Gaussian distributions.
Similar articles
-
A model of top-down gain control in the auditory system.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1562-78. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0097-7. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21487927 Free PMC article.
-
The stimulus range effect: evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition.Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jul;56(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03211685. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8084726
-
Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in broadband noise.Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jan;47(1):92-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03208170. Percept Psychophys. 1990. PMID: 2300430
-
Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3085-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3085. J Neurophysiol. 1997. PMID: 9212259
-
Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones.J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1560-73. doi: 10.1121/1.1543933. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003. PMID: 12656391
Cited by
-
Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.Front Neurol. 2014 Dec 15;5:271. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00271. eCollection 2014. Front Neurol. 2014. PMID: 25566177 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hedonic contrast and condensation: good stimuli make mediocre stimuli less good and less different.Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):235-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193836. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006. PMID: 16892987
-
Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure.Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Jun;16(3):594-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.594. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009. PMID: 19451390
-
In pursuit of taste phenotypes.Chem Senses. 2013 May;38(4):289-92. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjt007. Epub 2013 Feb 21. Chem Senses. 2013. PMID: 23429242 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-modal commutativity of magnitude productions of loudness and brightness.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2955-2967. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02324-y. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021. PMID: 34105093 Free PMC article.