Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Jul;17(7):493-503.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10421.x.

A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care

Bruce L Rollman  1 , Barbara H Hanusa, Henry J Lowe, Trae Gilbert, Wishwa N Kapoor, Herbert C Schulberg
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care

Bruce L Rollman et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether feedback and treatment advice for depression presented to primary care physicians (PCPs) via an electronic medical record (EMR) system can potentially improve clinical outcomes and care processes for patients with major depression.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Academically affiliated primary care practice in Pittsburgh, PA.

Patients: Two hundred primary care patients with major depression on the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) and who met all protocol-eligibility criteria.

Intervention: PCPs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 levels of exposure to EMR feedback of guideline-based treatment advice for depression: "active care" (AC), "passive care" (PC), or "usual care" (UC).

Measurements and main results: Patients' 3- and 6-month Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) score and chart review of PCP reports of depression care in the 6 months following the depression diagnosis. Only 22% of patients recovered from their depressive episode at 6 months (HRS-D </=7). Patients' mean HRS-D score decreased regardless of their PCPs' guideline-exposure condition (20.4 to 14.2 from baseline to 6-month follow-up; P <.001). However, neither continuous (HRS-D </=7: 22% AC, 23% PC, 22% UC; P =.8) nor categorical measures of recovery (P =.2) differed by EMR exposure condition upon follow-up. Care processes for depression were also similar by PCP assignment despite exposure to repeated reminders of the depression diagnosis and treatment advice (e.g., depression mentioned in >/=3 contacts with usual PCP at 6 months: 31% AC, 31% PC, 18% UC; P =.09 and antidepressant medication suggested/prescribed or baseline regimen modified at 6 months: 59% AC, 57% PC, 52% UC; P =.3).

Conclusions: Screening for major depression, electronically informing PCPs of the diagnosis, and then exposing them to evidence-based treatment recommendations for depression via EMR has little differential impact on patients' 3- or 6-month clinical outcomes or on process measures consistent with high-quality depression care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient recruitment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression for baseline, 3, and 6 months.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Katon W, Schulberg HC. Epidemiology of depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1992;14:237–47. - PubMed
    1. Broadhead E, Blazer D, George L, Tse C. Depression, disability days, and days lost in a prospective epidemiologic survey. JAMA. 1990;264:2524–8. - PubMed
    1. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:914–9. - PubMed
    1. Hays RD, Wells KB, Sherbourne CD, Rogers W, Spritzer K. Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illnesses. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:11–9. - PubMed
    1. Katon W, Sullivan MD. Depression and chronic medical illness. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51:3–11. - PubMed

Publication types