Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jul 19;2(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-2-7.

Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries

Affiliations

Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries

Ana Langer et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed women and providers' satisfaction with a new evidence-based antenatal care (ANC) model within the WHO randomized trial conducted in four developing countries. The WHO study was a randomized controlled trial that compared a new ANC model with the standard type offered in each country. The new model of ANC emphasized actions known to be effective in improving maternal or neonatal health, excluded other interventions that have not proved to be beneficial, and improved the information component, especially alerting pregnant women to potential health problems and instructing them on appropriate responses. These activities were distributed within four antenatal care visits for women that did not need any further assessment. METHODS: Satisfaction was measured through a standardized questionnaire administered to a random sample of 1,600 pregnant women and another to all antenatal care providers. RESULTS: Most women in both arms expressed satisfaction with ANC. More women in the intervention arm were satisfied with information on labor, delivery, family planning, pregnancy complications and emergency procedures. More providers in the experimental clinics were worried about visit spacing, but more satisfied with the time spent and information provided. CONCLUSIONS: Women and providers accepted the new ANC model generally. The safety of fewer visits for women without complications with longer spacing would have to be reinforced, if such a model is to be introduced into routine practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reid M, García J. Women's views of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editor. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 1989. pp. 131–142.
    1. Robinson J. The role of social sciences in evaluating perinatal care. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editor. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 1989. pp. 81–85.
    1. Belizán JM, Villar J, Belizán MZ, et al. Attendance of lower class women to prenatal control units in public hospitals in Rosario, Argentina. PAHO Bulletin. 1979;86:121–130. - PubMed
    1. Belizán JM, Quaranta P, Paquez E, Villar J. Cesarean section and fear of litigation. Lancet. 1991;338:1462. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92763-R. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–1748. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources