Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Jul;13(7):651-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00651.x.

Repolarization dynamics in patients with long QT syndrome

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Repolarization dynamics in patients with long QT syndrome

Juha S Perkiömäki et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Dynamics of ventricular repolarization may contribute to cardiac arrhythmias in subjects with the long QT syndrome (LQTS). The aim of the present study was to assess the dynamics of repolarization duration and the dynamics of repolarization complexity in LQTS patients and their unaffected family members.

Methods and results: Twelve-lead 24-hour ambulatory ECG recordings were obtained from LQTS patients (n = 38) and unaffected family members (n = 20). The 24-hour dynamics of the QT interval, T wave complexity (TWC) index measured by principal component analysis, and the RR interval were analyzed using standard deviation (SD) and square root of the mean squared differences of successive values of the parameters (RMSSD). QT variability, mean TWC, and TWC variability were increased in the LQTS patients compared with unaffected family members (QT-SD: 38 +/- 20 msec vs 19 +/- 7 msec, P = 0.0001; QT-RMSSD: 36 +/- 20 msec vs 14 +/- 8 msec, P = 0.0001; TWC: 27.7% +/- 11.1% vs 20.4% +/- 6.7%, P = 0.003; TWC-SD: 6.7% +/- 2.8% vs 4.6% +/- 1.8%, P = 0.003; TWC-RMSSD: 5.3% +/- 2.8% vs 3.7% +/- 1.2%, P = 0.004, respectively). At the same time, the measures of heart rate variability were similar between the affected and unaffected LQTS subjects (SD of normal-to-normal RR intervals [SDNN]: 94 +/- 25 msec vs 89 +/- 37 ms, P = 0.56; RMSSD: 49 +/- 26 msec vs 49 +/- 34 ms, P = 0.97, respectively).

Conclusion: Despite similar heart rate variability, QT variability and the variability of TWC are significantly increased in LQTS patients compared with unaffected family members, suggesting that disturbances in temporal dynamics of repolarization and repolarization complexity in LQTS patients possibly increase vulnerability to arrhythmias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources