A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care
- PMID: 12139910
- DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0306
A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care
Abstract
Objective: to compare data obtained from two sources, service providers and service users, regarding the maternity services in Scotland.
Design: an audit of maternity services involving site visits, staff interviews and a cross-sectional survey of service users.
Participants: lead professionals in every consultant-led maternity unit in Scotland and all 1639 women giving birth in Scotland during a ten-day period.
Data collection: structured group interviews with service providers and a questionnaire survey of recently delivered women.
Data analysis: professionals' and women's responses were cross-tabulated and differences in proportions were tested for statistical significance using the chi-square test.
Findings: a total of 1137 women completed the questionnaire (response rate 69%). Overall, there was good agreement between professionals' and women's perceptions of the aspects of care studied. However, there were disparities in some areas. For example, staff in eight units reported mechanisms to ensure early distribution of a free national pregnancy book; however, in six of these units less than 75% of women actually received this book prior to their first hospital visit. Eighteen units reported that they offer a postnatal 'reunion meeting'; in ten of these units, less than 50% of women were aware of the reunion meeting. Eighteen units reported a policy of each woman having a lead professional or care co-ordinator; in three of these units, less than 50% of women perceived that they had a care co-ordinator and for most women, the profession (midwife, general practitioner or obstetrician) of their perceived co-ordinator differed from that expected on the basis of staff reports. There was some evidence overall that unit policies had a direct influence on women's responses.
Conclusions and implications for practice: this study demonstrates the importance of using a range of complementary methods of data collection and of ascertaining both service users' and providers' views when assessing the quality of care. Further research is required to explore differences in service provider's and women's perceptions and how this information can be used to improve the quality of maternity care. The finding that service provision may influence women's preferences has important implications for service planning, in particular the introduction of new models of care, and this needs further exploration.
Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Similar articles
-
A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland.Midwifery. 2000 Dec;16(4):303-13. doi: 10.1054/midw.2000.0231. Midwifery. 2000. PMID: 11080466
-
Women's views about maternity care: how do women conceptualise the process of continuity?Midwifery. 2015 Jan;31(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 14. Midwifery. 2015. PMID: 24861672
-
Does general practitioner involvement in commissioning maternity care make a difference?J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Apr;6(2):99-104. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927297. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001. PMID: 11357251
-
Redesigning postnatal care: a randomised controlled trial of protocol-based midwifery-led care focused on individual women's physical and psychological health needs.Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(37):1-98. doi: 10.3310/hta7370. Health Technol Assess. 2003. PMID: 14622490 Review.
-
Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence.Midwifery. 2000 Sep;16(3):186-96. doi: 10.1054/midw.1999.0208. Midwifery. 2000. PMID: 10970752 Review.
Cited by
-
'Who assisted with the delivery of (NAME)?' Issues in estimating skilled birth attendant coverage through population-based surveys and implications for improving global tracking.BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 22;4(2):e001367. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001367. eCollection 2019. BMJ Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 31139455 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources