Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications
- PMID: 12141888
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00004
Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications
Abstract
Background: Management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has evolved from hospitalisation for intravenous heparin therapy to treatment options that include acute management as an outpatient. While efficacy and safety remain the principal basis for choosing a therapy, the economic consequences of that choice should be considered as well.
Objective: To estimate the average cost of various DVT management options from the perspective of US health payers.
Design: Inpatient and outpatient management strategies were examined. Inpatient cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Edition, Clinical Modification codes and were classified into subgroups according to complication status. A cost estimate was developed by applying unit costs to the corresponding course of treatment. Cost estimates included initial acute care and that occurring in the following 6 months. Resource use profiles and unit costs were derived from several statewide inpatient, emergency room and ambulatory care databases supplemented by national fee schedules, published reports and peer-reviewed literature. All costs are reported in 1999 US dollars.
Results: The mean 6-month treatment costs for inpatient management ranged from US dollars 3906 to US dollars 17,168, depending on complication status. For outpatient management, the cost ranged from US dollars 2394 to US dollars 3369, depending on frequency of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injection and need for professional assistance.
Conclusions: The management strategy selected for DVT has an important economic impact. Self-administered LMWH in a homecare setting results in the lowest cost. However, as some patients either cannot, or will not, be treated this way, it is important for decision makers to consider the costs of other strategies.
Similar articles
-
Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(9):593-602. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 12141887
-
Management of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: pharmacoeconomic evaluation of outpatient treatment with enoxaparin vs inpatient treatment with unfractionated heparin.Chest. 2002 Jul;122(1):108-14. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.1.108. Chest. 2002. PMID: 12114345
-
The outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis delivers cost savings to patients and their families, compared to inpatient therapy.Thromb Res. 2003;112(1-2):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2003.09.027. Thromb Res. 2003. PMID: 15013267
-
Does low-molecular-weight heparin reduce the costs of venous thromboembolism treatment?Haemostasis. 2000;30 Suppl 2:136-40; discussion 128-9. doi: 10.1159/000054180. Haemostasis. 2000. PMID: 11251358 Review.
-
Outpatient therapy with low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: a review of efficacy, safety, and costs.Am J Med. 2003 Sep;115(4):298-308. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00326-7. Am J Med. 2003. PMID: 12967695 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(9):593-602. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00003. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002. PMID: 12141887
-
Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians.Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;5(1):74-80. doi: 10.1370/afm.668. Ann Fam Med. 2007. PMID: 17261867 Free PMC article.
-
The economic burden of supportive care of cancer patients.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Apr;12(4):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0513-1. Epub 2004 Feb 7. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 14767748
-
Evaluation and management of thromboprophylaxis in Moroccan hospitals at national level: the Avail-MoNa study.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Jul;46(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1657-7. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018. PMID: 29651665
-
Converting IMPROVE bleeding and VTE risk assessment models into a fast-and-frugal decision tree for optimal hospital VTE prophylaxis.Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 25;8(12):3214-3224. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013166. Blood Adv. 2024. PMID: 38621198 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical