Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions
- PMID: 12142899
- DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.125235
Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions
Abstract
The effects of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile, with or without the extraction of teeth, have greatly concerned orthodontists. A study was made of 80 patients with Angle Class I malocclusion. Forty patients (24 girls, 16 boys) did not undergo extraction of teeth, and 40 patients (23 girls, 17 boys) underwent extraction of maxillary and mandibular first premolars. Data were obtained from the corresponding lateral radiographs of the head taken before and after orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the response of the soft tissue of the facial profile in Class I malocclusions treated with and without the extraction of the 4 first premolars. The main soft tissue differences between the groups at the end of treatment were more retruded upper and lower lips in the extraction patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.Br J Orthod. 1997 Feb;24(1):25-34. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.1.25. Br J Orthod. 1997. PMID: 9088600
-
Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04512-2. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38937790 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):539-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.052. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18405818 Clinical Trial.
-
Soft tissue changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Jun;126(3):167-179. doi: 10.1111/eos.12409. Epub 2018 Feb 26. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018. PMID: 29480521
-
Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction : A systematic review.J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Mar;85(2):146-162. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00411-9. Epub 2022 Jul 13. J Orofac Orthop. 2024. PMID: 35829730 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Reference points to evaluate changes in the upper lip after labial incisor movement between tipping and translation in crowding patients: A retrospective study.Heliyon. 2024 Oct 16;10(21):e39409. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39409. eCollection 2024 Nov 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39568842 Free PMC article.
-
Cephalometric and Photographic Evaluation of the Nasolabial Angle in Orthodontically Treated Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;15(2):132. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020132. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39857016 Free PMC article.
-
Cephalometric evaluation of soft tissue changes after extraction of upper first premolars in class ΙΙ div 1 patients.J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Dec 1;6(5):e539-45. doi: 10.4317/jced.51474. eCollection 2014 Dec. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014. PMID: 25674323 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects.Turk J Orthod. 2018 Sep;31(3):67-72. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17051. Epub 2018 Jul 11. Turk J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 30206564 Free PMC article.
-
Which factors influence orthodontists in their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey.J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 May 1;11(5):e432-e438. doi: 10.4317/jced.55709. eCollection 2019 May. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019. PMID: 31275515 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources