Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2002 Aug;19(8):643-8.
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x.

A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes

L Howells et al. Diabet Med. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate changes in self-efficacy for self-management in young people with Type 1 diabetes participating in a "Negotiated Telephone Support" (NTS) intervention developed using the principles of problem solving and social learning theory.

Methods: One-year RCT with 79 young people (male 39; mean age +/- sd 16.5 +/- 3.2 years, duration 6.7 +/- 4.4 years, HbA(1c) 8.6 +/- 1.5%) randomized into: Group 1 (control group), continued routine management, n = 28; Group 2, continued routine management with NTS, n = 25; Group 3, annual clinic with NTS, n = 26.

Outcome measures: HbA(1c), self-efficacy, barriers to adherence, problem solving, and diabetes knowledge.

Results: There were no differences between the groups at baseline. Participants in Groups 2 and 3 received an average of 16 telephone calls/year (range 5-19), median duration 9 min (2-30), with a median interval of 3 weeks (1-24) between calls. Significant correlations were found between age and average length of call (r = 0.44, P < 0.01) and frequency of contact (r = 0.36, P < 0.05). Social and school topics were discussed frequently. After 1 year, while the participants in the two intervention groups showed significant improvements in self-efficacy (P = 0.035), there was no difference in glycaemic control in the three groups. Barriers to insulin use adherence were a significant predictor of HbA(1c) (P < 0.001) after controlling for baseline.

Conclusions: NTS is an effective medium to deliver a simple theory-based psychological intervention to enhance self-efficacy for diabetes self-management. Reduced clinic attendance, combined with NTS, did not result in a deterioration of HbA(1c). Intensive personal support needs to be combined with intensive diabetes therapy to improve glycaemic control in this age group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources