[Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients]
- PMID: 12148423
[Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients]
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study is to analyse the own data and try to discuss if laparoscopic appendectomy offers any advantages in treating young women suffering from pain in right lower abfdominal quadrant.
Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 148 patients admitted from October 1993 to December 1998 with diagnosis of of pain in right iliac fossa and operated on with a laparoscopic (LA group: 75 cases) or open approach (OA group: 73 cases). Patients were prospectively randomized on the surgical approach adopted, following a randomized list.
Results: The operative time in LA group was significantly (p < 0.001) longer (87.2 minutes) than for OA group (65.2 minutes). In 2 patients (2.7%) the operation had to be converted. Diagnosis had remained unknown in 16 patients (21.9%) of OA group, in spite of only one case (1.4%) with laparoscopic technique. We didn't observed intraoperative complications. Pain in the first and second postoperative days, evaluated on the use of pain medication, was significantly less in patients in group LA (p < 0.01). There were no deaths. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (5.5%) of group LA, and in 8 patients (10.9%) of group OA. Hospital stay was significantly shorter for those having laparoscopic appendectomy (p < 0.001).
Discussion: The main advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy consist more in diagnostic accuracy, than in less postoperative pain, less hospital stay and less postoperative complications.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and accurate approach.
Similar articles
-
[Appendicectomy: laparoscopic or ''open approach''?].Minerva Chir. 2005 Feb;60(1):47-54. Minerva Chir. 2005. PMID: 15902053 Italian.
-
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8. Osaka City Med J. 2007. PMID: 17867628
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002. PMID: 11875999
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature.Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):459-63. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997. PMID: 9438626 Review.
Cited by
-
Early laparoscopy for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain: a critical appraisal of the evidence.Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):10-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1145-4. Epub 2010 Jun 30. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20589513
-
Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 22;2014(5):CD007683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007683.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24848893 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30484855 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical