Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Aug;43(4):319-21.
doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00407-8.

In vitro activity of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, moxifloxacin and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparative evaluation by the E test and a broth microdilution method

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In vitro activity of linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, moxifloxacin and mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparative evaluation by the E test and a broth microdilution method

Jochen Abb. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

The E test and broth microdilution showed comparable accuracy for the susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). All of the 109 primary clinical MRSA isolates were fully susceptible to the glycopeptides vancomycin and teicoplanin, the oxazolidinone linezolid, and the streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin. Nine out of the 109 MRSA isolates (8.3 percent) demonstrated resistance to moxifloxacin and 5 out of the 109 strains (4.6 percent) were resistant to the topical agent mupirocin. Linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin may prove useful alternatives for the treatment of patients with MRSA infections. MRSA isolates should be screened for in vitro susceptibility against mupirocin prior to the topical application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources