[Evaluation of the viability and validity of an instrument to measure community activation]
- PMID: 12154529
- PMCID: PMC6979767
- DOI: 10.1007/BF03405015
[Evaluation of the viability and validity of an instrument to measure community activation]
Abstract
Objective: This study examines psychometric properties of a community activation assessment scale used for the evaluation of the Quebec project within the Federal Provincial Heart Health Initiative. The scale is composed of three sub scales, one for each of the intervention target risk factors.
Methods: Data were collected by telephone interviews conducted with 199 key informants from the 24 communities of the project. Reliability was studied using Cronbach's alpha coefficients and intraclass correlations. Validity was explored with factor analysis techniques.
Results: Subscales' internal consistency were very good, ranging from 0.71 to 0.83, but intraclass correlations between informants from the same communities were low. Factor analyses indicated a unidimensional structure for each scale.
Interpretation: These results show that the scale seems to provide reasonable assessments of the opinion of key informants regarding activation in their community. However, ranking communities based on the aggregated scores from local key informants may lead to classification problems.
Objectif: Cet article étudie les propriétés psychométriques d’une mesure de l’activation communautaire utilisée dans l’évaluation du volet québécois de l’Initiative fédéraleprovinciale en santé du coeur. Cette mesure comporte 3 échelles, une pour chaque cible d’intervention.
Méthode: Les données ont été collectées par enquête téléphonique auprès de 199 informateurs-clé issus des 24 communautés du projet. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach et la corrélation intraclasse ont permis d’étudier la fiabilité des échelles, leur validité a été estimée par analyses factorielles exploratoires.
Résultats: L’instrument présente une bonne consistance interne avec des coefficients alphas de Cronbach variant de 0,71 à 0,83. Les coefficients de corrélation intraclasse sont très faibles (−0,04 à 0,11). Les analyses factorielles indiquent une structure unidimensionnelle pour chaque échelle.
Interprétation: Ces résultats indiquent que l’instrument semble bien mesurer les opinions des informateurs mais qu’une classification des communautés à partir d’un score obtenu par l’agrégation des opinions d’informateurs d’une même communauté pourrait être problématique.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the Fabreville Heart Health Program in Laval, Canada: a dialogue between two paradigms, positivism and constructivism.Health Promot Int. 2003 Jun;18(2):127-34. doi: 10.1093/heapro/18.2.127. Health Promot Int. 2003. PMID: 12746384
-
Development and Assessment of a Questionnaire to Study Protection, Promotion, and Support of Breastfeeding.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):166-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 11. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016. PMID: 26874265
-
[Development and evaluation of the reliability and validity of an empowerment scale for health promotion volunteers].Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011 Aug;58(8):617-27. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 22111383 Japanese.
-
The development of measures of community capacity for community-based funding programs in Canada.Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):299-306. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam024. Epub 2007 Oct 17. Health Promot Int. 2007. PMID: 17942594 Review.
-
Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Mar-Apr;5(2):164-76. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050164. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998. PMID: 9524349 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources