Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1979 Apr;29(2):234-44.

Comparative study of Lippes Loop and CuT inserted in immediate post-abortal period

  • PMID: 12156558
Comparative Study

Comparative study of Lippes Loop and CuT inserted in immediate post-abortal period

N N Chowdhury et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1979 Apr.

Abstract

PIP: 300 cases were selected from Medical Termination of Pregnancy Clinic of Eden Hospital, Medical College, Calcutta, India in order to establish the safety and efficacy of immediate post-abortal insertion of 2 different types of IUDs - the Lippes loop and Cu T. The objective of the investigation was to compare 3 groups of cases in immediate post-abortal period, regarding ease of insertion, insertional bleeding, post-menstrual disturbance, continuation of device, and incidence of pregnancy. The cases were grouped as follows: 1) group A - 100 cases in which no IUD was inserted; 2) group B - 100 immediate post-abortal cases where a Lippes loop (27.5 mm size) was inserted; and 3) group C - 100 immediate post-abortal cases where CuT 200 was inserted. Subsequently, the number of cases having bleeding decreased in group A, where IUDs were not inserted. Between groups B and C duration of bleeding markedly decreased in group C. At 7 days and 1 month after discharge, bleeding varied from light to heavy where Lippes loops were inserted. Cu T has a noticeable improvement in this aspect, but there was some incidence of bleeding varying from light to moderate in comparison to Group A. The incidence of abdominal pain in follow-up cases in group B was more at both 7 days and 1 month following the insertion than in groups C and A. There was a definite increase in leucorrhea and pelvic pain in group B in comparison to groups C and A. In group B there was early onset of menstruation in comparison to groups A and C. There was hardly any difference between groups A and C regarding onset of menstruation. There was an increase in incidence of removal of the device in group B in comparison to group C. There was 1 incidence of expulsion and pregnancy in group C; the expulsion rate was 7% and the pregnancy rate was 1% in group B.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types