Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
- PMID: 12162362
- PMCID: PMC3202403
- DOI: 10.1007/s101620010095
Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss
Abstract
Measures of energetic and informational masking were obtained from 46 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The task was to detect the presence of a sequence of eight contiguous 60-ms bursts of a pure tone embedded in masker bursts that were played synchronously with the signal. The masker was either a sequence of Gaussian noise bursts (energetic masker) or a sequence of random-frequency 2-tone bursts (informational masker). The 2-tone maskers were of two types: one type that normally tends to produce large amounts of informational masking and a second type that normally tends to produce very little informational masking. The two informational maskers are called "multiple-bursts same" (MBS), because the same frequency components are present in each burst of a sequence, and "multiple-bursts different" (MBD), because different frequency components are presented in each burst of a sequence. The difference in masking observed for these two maskers is thought to occur because the signal perceptually segregates from the masker in the MBD condition but fuses with the masker in MBS. In the present study, the effectiveness of the MBD masker, measured as the signal-to-masker ratio at masked threshold, increased with increasing hearing loss. In contrast, the signal-to-masker ratio at masked threshold for the MBS masker changed much less as a function of hearing loss. These results suggest that sensorineural hearing loss interferes with the ability of the listener to perceptually segregate individual components of complex sounds. The results from the energetic masking condition, which included critical ratio estimates for all listeners and auditory filter characteristics for a subset of the listeners, indicated that increasing hearing loss also reduced frequency selectivity at the signal frequency. Overall, these results suggest that the increased susceptibility to masking observed in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss is a consequence of both peripheral and central processes.
Similar articles
-
Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. doi: 10.1121/1.1784437. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004. PMID: 15532655
-
Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Mar;111(3):1367-76. doi: 10.1121/1.1448342. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002. PMID: 11931314 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr;117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. doi: 10.1121/1.1861598. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005. PMID: 15898658
-
Enhancing Auditory Selective Attention Using a Visually Guided Hearing Aid.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):3027-3038. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0071. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 29049603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system.Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):108-24. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.108. Psychol Rev. 1998. PMID: 9450373 Review.
Cited by
-
Psychometric functions for informational masking.J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3273-82. doi: 10.1121/1.1629303. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003. PMID: 14714808 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Jun;16(3):389-99. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0499-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25790949 Free PMC article.
-
Conductive hearing loss during development does not appreciably alter the sharpness of cochlear tuning.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83115-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33597563 Free PMC article.
-
The P300 Auditory Event-Related Potential May Predict Segregation of Competing Speech by Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.Front Neurosci. 2022 Jun 10;16:888596. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.888596. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35757527 Free PMC article.
-
The Slowest Timescales of Neural Synchronization Reveal the Strongest Influence of Auditory Distraction.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 May 5:2025.05.05.652235. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.05.652235. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40654883 Free PMC article. Preprint.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources