Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy
- PMID: 12163950
- DOI: 10.1007/s004640090078
Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy
Abstract
Background: Recent developments in laparoscopic solid organ surgery suggest a possible reduction in postoperative discomfort and disability for kidney donors. Technical aspects and the influence of surgical experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were evaluated.
Methods: The clinical outcome of 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LapNx) was compared with that for a historic control group of 27 open donor nephrectomies (OpenNx).
Results: Three conversions to open nephrectomy (5.2%) were necessary. Postoperative complications were minor and comparable in both groups. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay, but operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly longer. Graft survival after LapNx was 100% during a median follow-up period of 13 months. Operative time for LapNx decreased considerably with experience gained and seemed to be less for right nephrectomy. Stenotic ureter-bladder anastomoses occurred after LapNx in four patients during the first half year (7.0%), but this problem seemed to be resolved after modification of the technique.
Conclusion: LapNx is associated with less postoperative discomfort and improved convalescence.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy--a comparison with the open approach.Transplantation. 1997 Jan 27;63(2):229-33. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199701270-00009. Transplantation. 1997. PMID: 9020322 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1132-5. Am Surg. 2000. PMID: 11149584
-
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy and conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor and recipient outcomes.Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.077. Epub 2011 Oct 11. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21996107
-
Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jun;399(5):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1196-4. Epub 2014 Apr 28. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014. PMID: 24770877 Review.
-
Right Versus Left Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun;13(3):214-26. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015. PMID: 26086831 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.BMJ. 2006 Jul 29;333(7561):221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38886.618947.7C. Epub 2006 Jul 17. BMJ. 2006. PMID: 16847014 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats.Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):351-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055272.96210.A0. Ann Surg. 2003. PMID: 12616118 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.J Minim Access Surg. 2005 Oct;1(4):155-64. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.19262. J Minim Access Surg. 2005. PMID: 21206658 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of intraoperative donor management on short-term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg. 2002 Jul;236(1):127-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200207000-00019. Ann Surg. 2002. PMID: 12131095 Free PMC article.
-
Transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current status.Indian J Urol. 2007 Jul;23(3):294-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.33727. Indian J Urol. 2007. PMID: 19718333 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources