Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Jun;16(6):989-95.
doi: 10.1007/s004640080182. Epub 2002 Feb 28.

Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection forrectal adenocarcinoma

Affiliations

Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection forrectal adenocarcinoma

E C Poulin et al. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is controversial. Actuarial survival and local recurrence rates have not been determined.

Methods: A prospective database containing 80 consecutive unselected laparoscopic resections of rectal cancers performed between November 1991 and 1999 was reviewed. Local recurrence was defined as any detectable local disease at follow-up assessment occurring either alone or in conjunction with generalized recurrence. The tumor node metastases (TNM) classification for colorectal cancers and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to determine staging and survival curves. The mesorectal excision technique was used during surgery.

Results: The median follow-up period was 31 months for patients with stages I, II, and III cancer, and 15.5 months for patients with stage IV cancer. The overall 5-year survival rate was 65.1% for all cancer stages and 72.1% for stages I, II, and III cancer. No trocar-site recurrence was observed. The overall local recurrence rate was 3.75% (3/80) for all cancer stages, and 4.3% (3/70) for stages I, II, and III cancer.

Conclusions: The survival and local recurrence rates for patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic mesorectal excision do not differ negatively from those in the literature for open mesorectal excision. Further validation is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):809-12 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(11):1602-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Oct;181(4):335-46 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1999 Apr;229(4):487-92 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Aug;25(4):368-74 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources