Asymmetric maxillary expansion (AMEX) appliance for treatment of true unilateral posterior crossbite
- PMID: 12165770
- DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.125563
Asymmetric maxillary expansion (AMEX) appliance for treatment of true unilateral posterior crossbite
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an asymmetrical maxillary expansion (AMEX) appliance. Patients with true unilateral posterior crossbites were included in the study. The treatment group consisted of 18 patients who had a mean age of 14 +/- 2.3 years. Treatment effects were evaluated on posteroanterior radiographs, dental casts, and photographs of the dental casts. All unilateral posterior crossbites were corrected in a mean expansion treatment time of 3.3 +/- 0.48 months. As a result of expansion, maxillary interfirst molar, interfirst and second premolar, and intercanine arch widths increased significantly. Comparison of the 2 sides showed that the teeth on the crossbite side moved and tipped more buccally than the teeth on the noncrossbite side. Of the total expansion gained, 75.8% to 91.7% was due to the buccal movements of the teeth on the noncrossbite side. The AMEX appliance was found to be effective in correcting true unilateral posterior crossbites, and therefore it can be recommended for clinical use.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation and comparison of stresses and displacements generated by four different types of asymmetric maxillary expansion appliances in true unilateral crossbite using finite element method.Int Orthod. 2022 Sep;20(3):100668. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100668. Epub 2022 Jul 22. Int Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35879207
-
A clinical investigation of the correction of unilateral first molar crossbite with a transpalatal arch.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Apr;107(4):418-25. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70095-1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. PMID: 7709907
-
Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar.Prog Orthod. 2003;4:15-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9975.2002.02034.x. Prog Orthod. 2003. PMID: 12887575 Clinical Trial.
-
Unilateral posterior crossbite with mandibular shift: a review.J Can Dent Assoc. 2005 Sep;71(8):569-73. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005. PMID: 16202196 Review.
-
Comparison of effectiveness of quad helix appliance with other slow maxillary expanders in children with posterior crossbite: A systematic review.J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;36(3):225-233. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_85_17. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018. PMID: 30246741
Cited by
-
Asymmetric Expansion with a Modified Quad Helix for Treatment of Isolated Crossbite.Case Rep Dent. 2017;2017:7275846. doi: 10.1155/2017/7275846. Epub 2017 May 14. Case Rep Dent. 2017. PMID: 28589044 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of symmetric and asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion treatments on pharyngeal airway and sinus volume.Angle Orthod. 2020 May 1;90(3):425-431. doi: 10.2319/050819-320.1. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 33378426 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of miniscrew-assisted maxillary expansion in the treatment of unilateral maxillary constriction: A finite element study.J Orthod Sci. 2025 Mar 25;14:10. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_71_24. eCollection 2025. J Orthod Sci. 2025. PMID: 40302885 Free PMC article.
-
A Modification of the Quad Helix: The "Bi Helix".Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jul;17(7):822-825. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2889. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024. PMID: 39372539 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and CT Scan Evaluation of Outcomes of Modified SARPE Using a Bone-Borne Hyrax Appliance in Unilateral Posterior Crossbite.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):900-907. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01756-9. Epub 2022 Jul 1. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023. PMID: 38105837 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials