Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Aug;110(2 Suppl):S111-6.
doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.125330.

Management of natural rubber latex allergy

Affiliations
Review

Management of natural rubber latex allergy

David I Bernstein. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

Issues of impairment, compensation, and disability are appropriately directed at health care workers with latex allergy and occupational asthma or anaphylaxis who may not be able to re-enter a work environment with ambient exposure to latex proteins. The following stepwise approach for managing a high-risk health care worker with natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy is recommended: (1) confirm the diagnosis of NRL allergy by using rational, validated methods; (2) justify cessation of further NRL exposure in the workplace; (3) determine whether there is impairment and disability resulting from NRL allergy; (4) advise employer and risk managers regarding the diagnosis and their responsibility to institute effective environmental interventions; (5) if accommodation efforts are unsuccessful, advise the worker to seek workers' compensation benefits and rehabilitation. Objective evidence of residual impairment caused by NRL-induced anaphylaxis or occupational asthma is often absent. Therefore, the physician must determine disability based on how work restrictions resulting from NRL allergy affect the worker's ability to perform current required tasks and duties. According to the Americans with Disabilities Act, the employer must make reasonable accommodations for an impaired employee. Therefore, an employee with NRL allergy and no objective evidence of impairment would not be considered to be disabled after successful interventions, which totally eliminate continued NRL protein exposure and the risks of work-related asthma and anaphylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Latex Allergy: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
    Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M. Nucera E, et al. J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Sep 28;13:385-398. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S242058. eCollection 2020. J Asthma Allergy. 2020. PMID: 33061465 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Latex Allergy - From Discovery to Component-resolved Diagnosis.
    Loverre T, Casella R, Miniello A, Di Bona D, Nettis E. Loverre T, et al. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(5):541-548. doi: 10.2174/1871530323666230901102131. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2024. PMID: 37680164 Review.
  • Latex Allergy in Children.
    Arasi S, Barni S, Caminiti L, Castagnoli R, Giovannini M, Liotti L, Mastrorilli C, Mori F, Pecoraro L, Saretta F, Gelsomino M, Klain A, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Novembre E. Arasi S, et al. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 25;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010124. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38202131 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Grand rounds: latex-induced occupational asthma in a surgical pathologist.
    Green-McKenzie J, Hudes D. Green-McKenzie J, et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jul;113(7):888-93. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7830. Environ Health Perspect. 2005. PMID: 16002378 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms