Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Aug;81(8):579-83.
doi: 10.1097/00002060-200208000-00004.

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: pressure, volume, and flow relationships and the adequacy of the manufacturer's guidelines

Affiliations

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: pressure, volume, and flow relationships and the adequacy of the manufacturer's guidelines

Elia Gómez-Merino et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Pulmonary complications of neuromuscular disease can be averted by increasing peak cough flows with the use of a forced exsufflation device. The purpose of this study was to examine the pressure, volume, and flow relationships for a range of settings generated by this device, and compare them with clinically efficacious values and the manufacturer's guidelines.

Methods: The In-exsufflator was connected to a standard lung model. The resulting forced deflation volumes, flows, and pressures were averaged over 10 cycles at each setting.

Results: The set insufflation pressures significantly correlated with the generated insufflation pressures and volumes and the exsufflation volumes and flows. Increasing set insufflation time significantly increased generated insufflation pressures, flows, and volumes and exsufflation volumes. Increasing set exsufflation time did not significantly increase generated exsufflation flows. At set pressures of 40 to -40 cm H2O, insufflation time of 3 sec, and exsufflation time of 2 sec, the exsufflation flow was 4.09 l/sec. A plateau insufflation volume of 3.8 l was reached after 4.9 sec of insufflation.

Conclusions: In-exsufflator performance was very consistent. Its clinical effectiveness can be explained by its generation of exsufflation flows >2.7 l/sec. Increasing insufflation times more than exsufflation times is more important for optimal function. Current manufacturer use guidelines may not yield optimal exsufflation flows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources