Double-blind study of high-dose fluoxetine versus lithium or desipramine augmentation of fluoxetine in partial responders and nonresponders to fluoxetine
- PMID: 12172337
- DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200208000-00008
Double-blind study of high-dose fluoxetine versus lithium or desipramine augmentation of fluoxetine in partial responders and nonresponders to fluoxetine
Abstract
In a previous study, of 41 depressed patients who had not responded to fluoxetine 20 mg/day, 53% were treated with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/ day) and responded (i.e., their 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D-17] score was <7) versus 29% and 25% of patients treated with fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day) or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day), respectively. We wanted to assess whether these findings could be replicated in a larger sample of depressed outpatients. We identified 101 outpatients with major depressive disorder (52 men and 49 women; mean age, 41.6 + 10.6 years) who were either partial responders (n = 49) or nonresponders (n = 52) to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/ day. These patients were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/day), fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day), or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day). In the overall group of patients (N = 101), there was no significant difference in response rates across the three treatment groups (high-dose fluoxetine, 42.4%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 29.4%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 23.5%). Dropout rates were also comparable, ranging from 9.1% (high-dose fluoxetine) to 14.7% (fluoxetine plus desipramine and fluoxetine plus lithium). There were also no significant differences in response rates across the three treatment groups among partial responders (high-dose fluoxetine, 50.0%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 33.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 33.3%) and nonresponders (high-dose fluoxetine, 35.3%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 26.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 12.5%). At the end of the study, the mean lithium level was 0.37 + 0.15 mEq/L (n = 27; range, 0.1-0.8 mEq/L) among lithium-treated patients, and the mean desipramine level was 104.7 + 58.8 ng/mL (n = 22; range, 25-257 ng/mL). There were no significant relationships between lithium or desipramine blood levels and degree of improvement (as measured by the change in HAM-D-17 score). We found no significant differences in efficacy among these three treatment strategies among patients who had failed to respond adequately to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day, although the high-fluoxetine group was associated with nonsignificantly higher response rates in both partial responders and nonresponders.
Similar articles
-
Lithium and tricyclic augmentation of fluoxetine treatment for resistant major depression: a double-blind, controlled study.Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;151(9):1372-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.9.1372. Am J Psychiatry. 1994. PMID: 8067495 Clinical Trial.
-
Psychosocial functioning during the treatment of major depressive disorder with fluoxetine.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Oct;24(5):507-11. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000138761.85363.d5. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004. PMID: 15349006 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes and genome-wide association for a brain methylation site in an antidepressant pharmacogenetics study in Mexican Americans.Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 1;171(12):1297-309. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.12091165. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Am J Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25220861 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Augmentation Strategies in Major Depression.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5338. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385173 Review.
-
Augmentation strategies for depression: history and concepts.CNS Spectr. 2007 Dec;12(12 Suppl 22):3-5. doi: 10.1017/s109285290001600x. CNS Spectr. 2007. PMID: 18396507 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: Evidences and personal experience.World J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 22;5(3):330-41. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v5.i3.330. World J Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26425446 Free PMC article.
-
Is dose escalation of antidepressants a rational strategy after a medium-dose treatment has failed? A systematic review.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Dec;255(6):387-400. doi: 10.1007/s00406-005-0579-5. Epub 2005 Apr 29. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 15868067
-
Pharmacological Treatments for Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Jun 4;13(6):116. doi: 10.3390/ph13060116. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32512768 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antidepressant combinations: cutting edge psychopharmacology or passing fad?Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Oct;15(10):403. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0403-2. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013. PMID: 24052267 Review.
-
Role of lithium augmentation in the management of major depressive disorder.CNS Drugs. 2014 Apr;28(4):331-42. doi: 10.1007/s40263-014-0152-8. CNS Drugs. 2014. PMID: 24590663 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources