Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments
- PMID: 12176768
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mef067
Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments
Abstract
Objectives: Although hearing protectors must be used as a temporary solution, their choice should take into account several aspects, such as ergonomic features, associated with this device. The present study aims to analyse the relationship between the acoustical attenuation efficiency and other aspects related to the comfort afforded by hearing protectors and, consequently, their acceptability when used in industrial noisy environments.
Methods: An evaluation of comfort was performed using a questionnaire, completed by 20 workers. Several scales related to the subjective feeling of comfort were used to quantify the comfort index of a given protector. Simultaneously, the time of usage of each protector was self-recorded by each subject. To test the relationship between the comfort index and the time during which protectors were used, a two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was applied.
Results and conclusions: The results obtained seem to demonstrate that there are significant differences between catalogued and effective attenuation. Protectors with less catalogued attenuation, but with higher acceptability, i.e. which were more comfortable, tended to be more efficient than protectors with a higher catalogued attenuation, but which were less comfortable. Finally, it must be emphasized that high efficiency can only be achieved through the attainment of an adequate balance between the range of parameters likely to determine its usage.
Comment in
-
The comfort and effectiveness of hearing protection devices.Ann Occup Hyg. 2003 Jun;47(4):337; author reply 338. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meg039. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003. PMID: 12765875 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.Codas. 2015 Jul-Aug;27(4):309-18. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014139. Codas. 2015. PMID: 26398252 English, Portuguese.
-
Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):86-92. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77193. Noise Health. 2011. PMID: 21368433
-
Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990;62(4):323-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00640841. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990. PMID: 2379964
-
What do we know about hearing protector comfort?Noise Health. 2008 Jul-Sep;10(40):83-9. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.44346. Noise Health. 2008. PMID: 19052440 Review.
-
The role of hearing protectors in leisure noise.Noise Health. 2003 Jan-Mar;5(18):47-55. Noise Health. 2003. PMID: 12631437 Review.
Cited by
-
Do hearing protectors protect hearing?Am J Ind Med. 2014 Sep;57(9):1001-10. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22323. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Am J Ind Med. 2014. PMID: 24700499 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among people working with sound systems and general population in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.BMC Public Health. 2008 May 7;8:151. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-151. BMC Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18462490 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014.Am J Ind Med. 2021 Dec;64(12):1002-1017. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23291. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Am J Ind Med. 2021. PMID: 34597431 Free PMC article.
-
Musician earplugs: Appreciation and protection.Noise Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(77):198-208. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.160688. Noise Health. 2015. PMID: 26168950 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry, and management options.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May 23;46(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0219-x. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017. PMID: 28535812 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical