Feature frequency effects in recognition memory
- PMID: 12184562
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03194962
Feature frequency effects in recognition memory
Erratum in
- Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1324
Abstract
Rare words are usually better recognized than common words, a finding in recognition memory known as the word-frequency effect. Some theories predict the word-frequency effect because they assume that rare words consist of more distinctive features than do common words (e.g., Shiffrin & Steyvers's, 1997, REM theory). In this study, recognition memory was tested for words that vary in the commonness of their orthographic features, and we found that recognition was best for words made up of primarily rare letters. In addition, a mirror effect was observed: Words with rare letters had a higher hit rate and a lower false-alarm rate than did words with common letters. We also found that normative word frequency affects recognition independently of letter frequency. Therefore, the distinctiveness of a word's orthographic features is one, but not the only, factor necessary to explain the word-frequency effect.
Similar articles
-
Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):778-86. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.778. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004. PMID: 15238022 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):312-20. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00164-0. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967214 Clinical Trial.
-
Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):595-609. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.493892. Epub 2010 Jul 30. Memory. 2010. PMID: 20677075
-
A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):257-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.257. Psychol Rev. 2001. PMID: 11212629 Review.
-
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 14967218 Review.
Cited by
-
Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency.Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):295-306. doi: 10.3758/bf03193408. Mem Cognit. 2006. PMID: 16752594
-
The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):35-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03196080. Mem Cognit. 2003. PMID: 12699141
-
Phrase frequency effects in free recall: Evidence for redintegration.J Mem Lang. 2017 Dec;97:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 14. J Mem Lang. 2017. PMID: 29269991 Free PMC article.
-
Limits to the attentional boost effect: the moderating influence of orthographic distinctiveness.Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):987-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0767-2. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015. PMID: 25413683
-
The effect of feature frequency on short-term recognition memory.Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):285-96. doi: 10.3758/bf03194387. Mem Cognit. 2003. PMID: 12749470
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical