Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep;86(9):1035-40.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.9.1035.

Emmetropisation following preterm birth

K J Saunders  1 , D L McCulloch, A J Shepherd, A G Wilkinson
Affiliations

Emmetropisation following preterm birth

K J Saunders et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

Background/aims: Even in the absence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), premature birth signals increased risk for abnormal refractive development. The present study examined the relation between clinical risk factors and refractive development among preterm infants without ROP.

Methods: Cycloplegic refraction was measured at birth, term, 6, 12, and 48 months corrected age in a cohort of 59 preterm infants. Detailed perinatal history and cranial ultrasound data were collected. 40 full term (plus or minus 2 weeks) subjects were tested at birth, 6, and 12 months old.

Results: Myopia and anisometropia were associated with prematurity (p<0.05). More variation in astigmatic axis was found among preterm infants (p<0.05) and a trend for more astigmatism (p<0.1). Emmetropisation occurred in the preterm infants so that at term age they did not differ from the fullterm group in astigmatism or anisometropia. However, preterm infants remained more myopic (less hyperopic) than the fullterm group at term (p<0.05) and those infants born <1500 g remained more anisometropic than their peers until 6 months (p<0.05). Infants with abnormal cranial ultrasound were at risk for higher hyperopia (p<0.05). Other clinical risk factors were not associated with differences in refractive development. At 4 years of age 19% of the preterm group had clinically significant refractive errors.

Conclusion: Preterm infants without ROP had high rates of refractive error. The early emmetropisation process differed from that of the fullterm group but neither clinical risk factors nor measures of early refractive error were predictive of refractive outcome at 4 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relation between gestational age and astigmatic error at birth for preterm infants.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of abnormal cranial ultrasound on MSE and astigmatism at birth among preterm infants.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean refractive errors of preterm and fullterm infants.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Individual refractive data for fullterm (A) and preterm infants (B–E) refracted repeatedly.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Fletcher MC, Brandon S. Myopia of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 1955;40:474–81. - PubMed
    1. Graham MV, Gray OP. Refraction of premature babies’ eyes. BMJ 1963;i:1452–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shapiro A, Yanko L, Nawratzki I, et al. Refractive power of premature children at infancy and early childhood. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:234–8. - PubMed
    1. Dobson V, Fulton AB, Manning K, et al. Cycloplegic refractions of premature infants. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;91:490–5. - PubMed
    1. Gordon RA, Donzis PB. Myopia associated with retinopathy of prematurity. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1593–8. - PubMed

Publication types