Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information
- PMID: 12188511
- DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000541
Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information
Abstract
Several authors have hypothesized that visuo-spatial working memory is functionally analogous to verbal working memory. Irrelevant background speech impairs verbal short-term memory. We investigated whether irrelevant visual information has an analogous effect on visual short-term memory, using a dynamic visual noise (DVN) technique known to disrupt visual imagery (Quinn & McConnell, 1996b). Experiment I replicated the effect of DVN on pegword imagery. Experiments 2 and 3 showed no effect of DVN on recall of static matrix patterns, despite a significant effect of a concurrent spatial tapping task. Experiment 4 showed no effect of DVN on encoding or maintenance of arrays of matrix patterns, despite testing memory by a recognition procedure to encourage visual rather than spatial processing. Serial position curves showed a one-item recency effect typical of visual short-term memory. Experiment 5 showed no effect of DVN on short-term recognition of Chinese characters, despite effects of visual similarity and a concurrent colour memory task that confirmed visual processing of the characters. We conclude that irrelevant visual noise does not impair visual short-term memory. Visual working memory may not be functionally analogous to verbal working memory, and different cognitive processes may underlie visual short-term memory and visual imagery.
Similar articles
-
The interval for interference in conscious visual imagery.Memory. 2006 Feb;14(2):241-52. doi: 10.1080/09658210500210019. Memory. 2006. PMID: 16484113
-
Executive processes in visual and spatial working memory tasks.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):79-100. doi: 10.1080/17470210600587976. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007. PMID: 17162509
-
Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Nov;56(8):1249-68. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000765. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003. PMID: 14578082
-
Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.Scand J Psychol. 1992 Sep;33(3):212-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00911.x. Scand J Psychol. 1992. PMID: 1488646 Review.
-
Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):779-819. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012. PMID: 22715024 Review.
Cited by
-
Visual distraction during word-list retrieval does not consistently disrupt memory.Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 23;5:362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00362. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24795688 Free PMC article.
-
Partial dissociation in the neural bases of VSTM and imagery in the early visual cortex.Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.026. Epub 2015 May 27. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 26026256 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic visual noise reduces confidence in short-term memory for visual information.Cogn Process. 2012 May;13(2):183-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0429-5. Epub 2011 Nov 26. Cogn Process. 2012. PMID: 22120748 Clinical Trial.
-
Mental imagery and visual working memory.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029221. Epub 2011 Dec 14. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22195024 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual teleology: expectations of action efficiency bias social perception.Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 8;285(1884):20180638. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0638. Proc Biol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30089623 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources