Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Aug 27;87(5):481-90.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600491.

The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE)

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE)

J S Waters et al. Br J Cancer. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

After years of nihilism towards the use of chemotherapy for non small cell lung cancer in the UK it would appear that we have now reached the point where the use of chemotherapy to relieve symptoms, maintain quality of life, and prolong life, are now accepted for informed patients with good performance status willing to accept short-term toxicities. The use of the new agents vinorelbine, gemcitabine and paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin are all active regimens which offer small but real advantages over standard UK triple therapies (MVP, MIC) in terms of resource use, toxicity profiles and response rates. Overall survival could be increased by as much as 10% at one year on indirect comparisons. The use of docetaxel as second line therapy now offers lung cancer patients a second bite of the cherry, and should overall also prolong survival. It is only in embracing these small gains that we can currently make progress in the treatment of NSCLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AlberolaVCampsCProvenciaMIslaDRosellRVadellCBoverIRuiz CasadoAAzagraPJiménezUGonzález-LarribaJLCardenalFArtalACarratoAMoralesSSánchezJJ2001Cisplatin/Gemcitabine (CG) vs Cisplatin/Gemcitabine/ Vinorelbine (CGV) vs Sequential Doublets of Gemcitabine/Vinorelbine followed by Ifosfamide/ Vinorelbine (GV/IV) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of a Spanish Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial (GEPC/98-02) Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20308a(abstract)
    1. AndersonHHopwoodPStephensRJThatcherNCottierBNicholsonMMilroyRMaughanTSFalkSJBondMGBurtPAConnollyCKMcIllmurrayMBCarmichaelJ2000Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer–a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Br J Cancer 83447453 - PMC - PubMed
    1. AndersonHLundBBachFThatcherNWallingJHansenHH1994Single-agent activity of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study J Clin Oncol 1218211826 - PubMed
    1. BonomiPKimKFaircloughDCellaDKuglerJRowinskyEJiroutekMJohnsonD2000Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial J Clin Oncol 18623631 - PubMed
    1. CardenalFLopez-CabrerizoMPAntonAAlberolaVMassutiBCarratoABarnetoILomasMGarciaMLianesPMontalarJVadellCGonzalez-LarribaJLNguyenBArtalARosellR1999Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 171218 - PubMed

MeSH terms