Sterilisation during unplanned caesarean sections for women likely to have a completed family--should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources
- PMID: 12197369
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.99427.x
Sterilisation during unplanned caesarean sections for women likely to have a completed family--should they be offered? Experience in a country with limited health resources
Abstract
Objective: To determine if it is proper to give a woman of higher parity who needs at short notice a caesarean section the option of a tubal ligation.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Maternity unit of a tertiary hospital in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Population: Women of higher parity who were delivered by an emergency caesarean section, by an elective caesarean section or vaginally and who had been asked or not asked whether they wanted a tubal ligation.
Methods: A postal questionnaire and visits to the participants.
Main outcome measures: Satisfaction with (in)fertility after having had, or not had, the option of a tubal ligation with the last delivery.
Results: In women who had an emergency caesarean section and who were successfully followed up, 301/418 (72.0%) had been offered a tubal ligation and 241/301 (80.1%) accepted. Of the 301 women, 269 (89.4%) were happy with the outcome. Thirty-two women were unhappy (of whom 6 had tubal ligation, 24 had declined a sterilisation and in 2 cases the doctor forgot to do the sterilisation). Of the 117/418 women not offered a tubal ligation, 75/117 (64.1%) regretted not having had one. The relative risk of being unhappy with the consequences of not being offered tubal ligation compared with being given this option was 6.0 (95% CI 4.2-8.6, P < 0.001). Tubal ligations performed during emergency caesarean sections had no higher regret rate (2.5%) in this setting than those performed during elective caesarean sections (3.2%) and not much higher than postpartum sterilizations (0.5%). Women who did not have a tubal ligation during an emergency caesarean section regretted this (56.4%) significantly more often than women who did not have a tubal ligation with an elective caesarean section (34.6%) or after vaginal delivery (45.0%) (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively).
Conclusions: We found no evidence that the need to take an urgent decision resulted in more regret following tubal ligation. Women were far more likely to regret declining a tubal ligation (40%) than regret accepting one (2.5%). In this setting, some women are more likely to die of the next pregnancy than to regret an emergency tubal ligation.
Similar articles
-
A review of bilateral tubal ligation at caesarean section in Jos, Nigeria.Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007 Sep;14(3):252-5. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007. PMID: 17767213
-
Female sterilization by tubal ligation at caesarean section in Makurdi, Nigeria.Ann Afr Med. 2010 Oct-Dec;9(4):246-50. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.70965. Ann Afr Med. 2010. PMID: 20935426
-
Risk factors for strong regret and subsequent IVF request after having tubal ligation.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;42(5):526-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00526.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002. PMID: 12495101
-
Postpartum tubal sterilisation: an international perspective on some programmatic issues.J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Jan;25(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020290. J Biosoc Sci. 1993. PMID: 8425886 Review.
-
Performing tubal sterilizations during women's postpartum hospitalization: a review of the United States and international experiences.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1992 Feb;47(2):71-9. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199202000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1992. PMID: 1538875 Review.
Cited by
-
The right to informed choice. A study and opinion poll of women who were or were not given the option of a sterilisation with their caesarean section.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 22;6(3):e14776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014776. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21445338 Free PMC article.
-
Discharge instructions given to women following delivery by cesarean section in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;2(4):e0000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000318. eCollection 2022. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36962191 Free PMC article.
-
Recent developments have made female permanent contraception an increasingly attractive option, and pregnant women in particular ought to be counselled about it.Contracept Reprod Med. 2016 Dec 12;1:23. doi: 10.1186/s40834-016-0034-1. eCollection 2016. Contracept Reprod Med. 2016. PMID: 29201412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FIGO's ethical recommendations on female sterilisation will do more harm than good: a commentary.J Med Ethics. 2015 Jun;41(6):478-87. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101827. Epub 2014 Jul 9. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25009073 Free PMC article.
-
Think globally act locally: the case for symphysiotomy.PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e71. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040071. PLoS Med. 2007. PMID: 17388656 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical