Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting
- PMID: 12197968
- PMCID: PMC1447253
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.9.1421
Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting
Abstract
Occupational health surveillance data are key to effective intervention. However, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics survey significantly underestimates the incidence of work-related injuries and illnesses. Researchers supplement these statistics with data from other systems not designed for surveillance. The authors apply the filter model of Webb et al. to underreporting by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, workers' compensation wage-replacement documents, physician reporting systems, and medical records of treatment charged to workers' compensation. Mechanisms are described for the loss of cases at successive steps of documentation. Empirical findings indicate that workers repeatedly risk adverse consequences for attempting to complete these steps, while systems for ensuring their completion are weak or absent.
Figures
References
-
- Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1991. DHHS publication PHS 91-50212.
-
- Morse T. Occupational Disease in Connecticut, 2000. Hartford: Connecticut Occupational Disease Surveillance Program; 2000.
-
- Morse T, Storey E. Fatalities from occupational diseases in Connecticut. Conn Me. 1999;63:463–466. - PubMed
-
- Sorock GS, Smith GS, Reeve GR, et al. Three perspectives on work-related injury surveillance systems. Am J Ind Med. 1997;32:116–128. - PubMed
-
- Kaufman JD, Henderson AK. Occupational disease reporting: a step toward safer workplaces. Washington Public Health. 1996;14. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/sphcm/wph/occdis.html. Accessed on September 26, 2000.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical