Effect of protein source on resistive-training-induced changes in body composition and muscle size in older men

Abstract

Background: Aging is associated with reductions in muscle mass and strength, but nutrition and exercise interventions can delay this progression and enhance the quality of life.

Objective: We examined whether the predominant source of protein consumed by older men influenced measures of muscle size and strength, body composition, resting energy expenditure, and skeletal muscle creatine concentrations in response to 12 wk of resistive training.

Design: After consuming a lactoovovegetarian (LOV) diet for 2 wk, 21 men aged 65 +/- 5 y were randomly assigned to either consume a beef-containing (BC) diet (n = 10) or to continue the LOV diet (n = 11) throughout resistive training. The BC diet included 0.6 g protein. kg(-1). d(-1) from beef and the LOV diet included 0.6 g protein. kg(-1). d(-1) from textured vegetable protein (soy) sources. The remaining protein in the diets came from self-selected LOV sources.

Results: The mean total protein intake for both groups ranged from 1.03 to 1.17 g. kg(-1). d(-1) during the intervention. Men in both groups had improvements (14-38%) in maximal dynamic strength of all the muscle groups trained with no significant difference between groups. With resistive training, cross-sectional muscle area of the vastus lateralis increased in both groups (4.2 +/- 3.0% and 6.0 +/- 2.6% for the LOV and BC groups, respectively) with no significant difference between groups. Body composition, resting energy expenditure, and concentrations of muscle creatine, phosphocreatine, and total creatine did not differ significantly between groups or change over time.

Conclusions: These data suggest that increases in muscle strength and size were not influenced by the predominant source of protein consumed by older men with adequate total protein intake.

FIGURE 1

Mean (± SD) midthigh muscle cross-sectional area, as measured with computed tomography, at week 3 (preintervention) and week 15 (postintervention) in the beef-containing (BC) diet group (■, n = 10) and the lactoovovegetarian (LOV) diet group (□, n = 11). At week 15, after the resistive-training intervention, subjects in both groups had significant increases (4.2 ± 3.0% and 6.0 ± 2.6% for the LOV and BC groups, respectively) in midthigh cross-sectional area with no significant difference between groups. Thus, there was no significant main effect of group and no significant group-by-time interaction, but the main effect of time was significant (P < 0.05).