Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Jun;55(3):259-69.

[Phototoxicity studies of pazufloxacin mesilate, a novel parenteral quinolone antimicrobial agent--in vitro and in vivo studies]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 12199110
Comparative Study

[Phototoxicity studies of pazufloxacin mesilate, a novel parenteral quinolone antimicrobial agent--in vitro and in vivo studies]

[Article in Japanese]
Mineko Nagasawa et al. Jpn J Antibiot. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Phototoxicity of pazufloxacin mesilate (PZFX mesilate), a novel parenteral quinolone antimicrobial agent, were evaluated in vitro and in vivo studies. In vitro, phototoxicity for cultured cells of PZFX, which is active principle of PZFX mesilate, was studied, and stability for long-wavelength ultraviolet (UVA) was examined. In vivo, phototoxicity tests in guinea pigs and rats, and photoallergenicity tests in guinea pigs were conducted. In the phototoxicity test on cultured cells, CHL/IU cells were irradiated UVA of 300-3000 mJ/cm2 in the presence of PZFX, ofloxacin (OFLX), lomefloxacin (LFLX) or sparfloxacin (SPFX) at 10 micrograms/mL. Phototoxic potencies for cultured cells of the quinolones tested were SPFX > LFLX > OFLX > PZFX. In addition, changes in ultraviolet absorption spectrum and residual rate of PZFX, OFLX, LFLX and SPFX were examined after UVA irradiation of 300-3000 mJ/cm2 to each solution. PZFX was stable for UVA compared with OFLX and LFLX. In the phototoxicity test of guinea pigs, each quinolone was administered intraperitoneally daily for 7 days, and UVA of about 11 J/cm2 was irradiated at 30 minutes after the last administration. Dose levels of each quinolone were 65 and 130 mg/kg of PZFX mesilate (dose levels converted to PZFX: 50 and 100 mg/kg), 50 and 100 mg/kg of nalidixic acid (NA), 100 mg/kg of OFLX, enoxacin (ENX), ciprofloxacin (CPFX), LFLX and SPFX. Grade of skin reaction (erythema) at 24 hours after UVA irradiation decreased in the order: SPFX > CPFX > NA > ENX = OFLX > LFLX > PZFX mesilate. Thus, PZFX mesilate was found to have the weakest phototoxicity. In the maximum plasma concentration of quinolones from 0.5 to 2.5 hours after administration, corresponding to the time of UVA irradiation, the concentration of the group administered PZFX mesilate was about 4.1 times higher than that of CPFX group, and about 1.3 times higher than that of SPFX group. The area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC0.5-2.5) of the group administered PZFX mesilate was the same as that of SPFX group, and about 3.2 times larger than that of CPFX group. These data showed that phototoxicity of PZFX mesilate was also weaker than that of CPFX or SPFX in consideration of AUC0.5-2.5. In the phototoxicity test of rats injected intravenously, no phototoxicity was observed at 130 mg/kg of PZFX mesilate. In the photoallergenicity test of guinea pigs, no photoallergenicity was observed by PZFX mesilate. As mentioned above, from in vitro studies PZFX was found to be stable for UVA irradiation compared with OFLX and LFLX, and phototoxicity for cultured cells of PZFX was weaker than that of SPFX, LFLX or OFLX. In addition, from in vivo studies phototoxicity of PZFX mesilate was found to be weaker than that of NA, OFLX, ENX, CPFX, LFLX or SPFX, and no photoallergenicity was observed. Therefore, photosensitive potency of PZFX mesilate might be less than that of other quinolones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources