High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity
- PMID: 12200550
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020432
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for the prevention of chronic lung disease of prematurity
Abstract
Background: There remains uncertainty concerning the safety and efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation as compared with those of conventional ventilation for the respiratory support of very preterm infants. We conducted a multicenter trial to determine whether early intervention with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation reduced mortality and the incidence of chronic lung disease among newborns with a gestational age of 28 weeks or less.
Methods: We randomly assigned preterm infants with a gestational age of 23 to 28 weeks to either conventional ventilation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation within one hour after birth. Randomization was stratified according to center and gestational age (23 to 25 weeks or 26 to 28 weeks).
Results: A total of 400 infants were assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, and 397 were assigned to conventional ventilation. The composite primary outcome (death or chronic lung disease, diagnosed at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age) occurred in 66 percent of the infants assigned to receive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and 68 percent of those in the conventional-ventilation group (relative risk in the group assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 0.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.08). Similar proportions of infants died or had chronic lung disease in each gestational-age group. In both treatment groups treatment failure occurred in 10 percent of infants (relative risk in the group assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.50). There were no significant differences between the groups in a range of other secondary outcome measures, including serious brain injury and air leak.
Conclusions: The results obtained with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional ventilation do not differ significantly in the early treatment of respiratory disease in very preterm infants. Assessment of long-term effects will require additional follow-up.
Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Ventilation with small tidal volumes.N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):630-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp020082. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12200549 No abstract available.
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia--are we there yet?N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):682-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020080. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12200557 No abstract available.
-
High-frequency ventilation.N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1181-2; author reply 1181-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200303203481220. N Engl J Med. 2003. PMID: 12646680 No abstract available.
-
High frequency oscillatory ventilation was not more effective than conventional ventilation in preterm infants.Evid Based Nurs. 2003 Apr;6(2):41. doi: 10.1136/ebn.6.2.41. Evid Based Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12710416 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for very-low-birth-weight infants.N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):643-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012750. N Engl J Med. 2002. PMID: 12200551 Clinical Trial.
-
Early inhaled nitric oxide therapy in premature newborns with respiratory failure.N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 27;355(4):354-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060442. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16870914 Clinical Trial.
-
Neuromotor outcome at 2 years of very preterm infants who were treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or conventional ventilation for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e860-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2082. Epub 2007 Mar 5. Pediatrics. 2007. PMID: 17339385 Clinical Trial.
-
Optimal ventilatory strategies and surfactant to protect the preterm lungs.Neonatology. 2008;93(4):302-8. doi: 10.1159/000121456. Epub 2008 Jun 5. Neonatology. 2008. PMID: 18525214 Review.
-
Lung-protective ventilation strategies in neonatology: what do we know--what do we need to know?Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):925-31. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000256724.70601.3A. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17255875 Review.
Cited by
-
Ventilatory management in extremely low birth weight infants.Mcgill J Med. 2006 Jul;9(2):95-101. Mcgill J Med. 2006. PMID: 18523620 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal Strategies of Mechanical Ventilation: Can We Avoid or Reduce Lung Injury?Neonatology. 2024;121(5):570-575. doi: 10.1159/000539346. Epub 2024 Jun 13. Neonatology. 2024. PMID: 38870922 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation on the chronic lung disease or death in preterm infants administered surfactant: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;45(1):77-84. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02185-x. Epub 2024 Dec 2. J Perinatol. 2025. PMID: 39623024
-
Early Changes and Indicators Characterizing Lung Aging in Neonatal Chronic Lung Disease.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 31;8:665152. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.665152. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34136503 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Research advances in the methods for weaning from high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec;21(12):1234-1238. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2019.12.016. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31874666 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources