Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002 Sep;17(9):2237-42.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2237.

Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? No, not in light of the scientific data

Affiliations
Review

Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? No, not in light of the scientific data

Sergio Oehninger et al. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate among reproductive endocrinologists and embryologists about the indications for ICSI in the management of the infertile couple. Analysis of published results indicates that there are no data to suggest that ICSI should be performed in all cases of in-vitro conception. If the results of the basic semen analysis and sperm function tests demonstrate an impairment of sperm fertilizing capacity, couples should be directed to ICSI. In cases of previous fertilization failure, ICSI usually results in an improved outcome. This suggests the presence of 'occult' male or female gamete defects that can be bypassed by ICSI. We stress that efforts should be geared toward the identification of the aetiology and pathophysiology of sperm and oocyte lesions/dysfunctions responsible for fertilization impairment and their potential contributions to defective embryogenesis. A better definition of the indications for ICSI is needed, together with the development of directed, simpler, less expensive and safer alternatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by