Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep;40(9):3232-6.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3232-3236.2002.

Sensitivity of three urinary antigen tests associated with clinical severity in a large outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in The Netherlands

Ed P F Yzerman  1 , Jeroen W den Boer, Kamilla D Lettinga, Joop Schellekens, Jacob Dankert, Marcel Peeters
Affiliations

Sensitivity of three urinary antigen tests associated with clinical severity in a large outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in The Netherlands

Ed P F Yzerman et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

In 1999 an outbreak involving 188 patients with Legionnaires' disease (LD) occurred among visitors to a flower show in the Netherlands. Two enzyme immunoassays (Binax and Biotest) and one immunochromatographic assay (Binax NOW) were tested, using urine samples from LD patients from the 1999 outbreak. Sensitivity was calculated using positive culture and/or seroconversion as the "gold standard" in outbreak-related patients with radiographically confirmed pneumonia who fulfilled the epidemiological critera. The Binax EIA, Biotest EIA, and Binax NOW assay showed overall sensitivities of 69, 71, and 72%, respectively. When the tests were performed with concentrated urine samples, the overall sensitivities increased to 79, 74, and 81%, respectively. Using multiple logistic regression analysis with backward elimination, a statistically significant association was found between clinical severity and test sensitivity for all tests. For patients with mild LD, the test sensitivities ranged from 40 to 53%, whereas for patients with severe LD who needed immediate special medical care, the sensitivities reached 88 to 100%. These findings have major implications for the diagnostic process in patients with mild pneumonia and suggest that patients with mild pneumonia may go underdiagnosed if urine antigen tests alone are used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Sensitivity for three urinary L. pneumophila antigen tests in different categories of clinical severity, using concentrated and unconcentrated urine.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aguero-Rosenfeld, M. E., and P. H. Edelstein. 1998. Retrospective evaluation of the Du Pont radioimmunoassay kit for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigenuria in humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1775-1778. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berdal, B. P., C. E. Farshy, and J. C. Feely. 1979. Detection of Legionella pneumophila in urine by enzyme-linked immunospecific assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 9:575-578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birtles, R. J., T. G. Harrison, D. Samuel, and A. G. Taylor. 1990. Evaluation of urinary antigen ELISA for diagnosing Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 infection. J. Clin. Pathol. 43:685-690. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boshuizen, H. C., S. E. Neppelenbroek, H. van Vliet, J. F. P. Schellekens, J. W. Den Boer, M. F. Peeters, and M. A. E. Conyn-van Spaendonck. 2001. Subclinical Legionella infection in workers near the source of a large outbreak of Legionnaires disease. J. Infect. Dis. 184:515-518. - PubMed
    1. Breiman, F. R., and J. C. Butler. 1998. Legionnaire's disease: clinical, epidemiological, and public health perspectives. Semin. Respir. Infect. 26:8-11. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances