Evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (directigen flu A+B) for simultaneous and differential detection of influenza a and B virus antigens from respiratory samples
- PMID: 12202608
- PMCID: PMC130707
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3515-3517.2002
Evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (directigen flu A+B) for simultaneous and differential detection of influenza a and B virus antigens from respiratory samples
Abstract
We report a prospective evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the direct, rapid, qualitative, simultaneous, and differential detection of the influenza A (IA) and B (IB) virus antigen in different respiratory samples. The EIA method was compared with the shell vial culture system (MDCK cell line) used with the same samples. We studied 160 samples from 93 (58.1%) pediatric patients (hospital emergency room) and from 67 (41.9%) adult patients (sentinel network). Seventy-four(46.2%) samples were considered positive; of them, 46 (62.2%) were from pediatric patients and 28 (37.8%) were from an adult group (P < 0.05), with overall positive values of 49.9% and 41.7%, respectively. All 74 (100%) of the positive samples were isolated in cell culture versus the 68.9% that were detected as positive by the new EIA method (P < 0.05). Of the 41 samples positive for the IA virus, the EIA detected 34 (82.9%) positive samples; of the 33 samples positive for the IB virus, the EIA detected 17 (51.5%) positive samples (P < 0.05). No false-positive reaction was detected with the EIA method (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). The overall results obtained in the comparison between the new EIA and the shell vial culture had a sensibility of 82.9% and predictive negative values of 92.4% for the IA virus and 51.5% and 84.3%, respectively, for the IB virus. This evaluation shows sensitivity and specificity percentages for the new EIA method that is acceptable for routine use in IA virus detection. The results obtained were worse for IB virus detection, but this new EIA method is actually the only one with the capacity to differentiate between the two influenza viruses.
Similar articles
-
[Comparison study of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay with an enzyme immunoassay and shell vial culture for influenza A and B virus detection in adult patients].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2010 Feb;28(2):95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2008.11.021. Epub 2009 May 23. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2010. PMID: 19477042 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
Suboptimal detection of influenza virus in adults by the Directigen Flu A+B enzyme immunoassay and correlation of results with the number of antigen-positive cells detected by cytospin immunofluorescence.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jul;41(7):3407-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.3407-3409.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12843105 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescence assay, dot-blot enzyme immunoassay, and shell vial culture in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections caused by influenza A virus.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Jul;25(3):143-5. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(96)00131-9. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996. PMID: 8902411
-
Evaluation of the Hexaplex assay for detection of respiratory viruses in children.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1696-701. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1696-1701.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11325976 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the directigen flu A+B membrane enzyme immunoassay with viral culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3707-10. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3707-3710.2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15297520 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):527-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01213-08. Epub 2009 Jan 7. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19129410 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid method for detection of influenza a and B virus antigens by use of a two-photon excitation assay technique and dry-chemistry reagents.J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3581-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00128-07. Epub 2007 Sep 12. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17855571 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of SmartCycler real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay in a public health laboratory with direct immunofluorescence and cell culture assays in a medical center for detection of influenza A virus.J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Aug;41(8):3597-601. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3597-3601.2003. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. PMID: 12904361 Free PMC article.
-
Advances and insights in the diagnosis of viral infections.J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 Oct 30;19(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01081-2. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021. PMID: 34717656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Viral agents causing lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children: evaluation of the Speed-Oligo® RSV assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;31(3):243-50. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1300-4. Epub 2011 Jun 2. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012. PMID: 21647616 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cox, N. J., and K. Subbarao. 1999. Influenza. Lancet 354:1277-1282. - PubMed
-
- Cruz, J. R., E. Quinonez, A. De Fernandez, and F. Peralta. 1987. Isolation of viruses from nasopharyngeal secretions: comparison of aspiration and swabbing as means of sample collection. J. Infect. Dis. 156:415-416. - PubMed
-
- Frank, A. L., L. H. Taber, C. R. Wells, J. M. Wells, W. P. Glezen, and A. Panedes. 1981. Patterns of shedding of myxoviruses and paramyxoviruses in children. J. Infect. Dis. 144:433-441. - PubMed
-
- Glezen, W. P., and J. D. Cherry. 1992. Influenza viruses, p. 1688-1704. In R. D. Feigin and J. D. Cherry (ed.), Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases, 3rd ed. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical