Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Aug;8(8):706-12.

The potential of pill splitting to achieve cost savings

Affiliations
  • PMID: 12212758
Free article

The potential of pill splitting to achieve cost savings

Randall S Stafford et al. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To present a methodology for identifying specific medications for which pill splitting is clinically appropriate and cost saving, to present data from a commercial managed care population on current pill-splitting practices, and to estimate additional cost savings from extended use of this strategy.

Study design: Retrospective pharmacy claims analysis.

Methods: Pharmacy claims data from a commercial managed care health plan covering 19,000 lives and national drug data were used to compile a list of frequently prescribed medications. Excluding medications in which packaging, formulation, and potential adverse pharmacologic outcomes prohibited splitting, we performed a cost analysis of medications amenable to splitting.

Results: Eleven medications amenable to pill splitting were identified based on potential cost savings and clinical appropriateness: clonazepam, doxazosin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, citalopram, sertraline, paroxetine, lisinopril, nefazadone, olanzapine, and sildenafil. For these medications, pill splitting is currently infrequent, accounting for annual savings of $6200 (or $0.03 per member per month), just 2% of the potential $259,500 (or $1.14 per member per month) that more comprehensive pill-splitting practices could save annually.

Conclusions: Pill splitting can be a cost-saving practice when implemented judiciously using drug- and patient-specific criteria aimed at clinical safety, although this strategy is used infrequently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Pill splitting.
    Webster RT. Webster RT. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Nov;8(11):925; author reply 925-6. Am J Manag Care. 2002. PMID: 12437308 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources