Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep;161(3):841-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64244-7.

alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase: expression levels of this novel cancer biomarker depend on tumor differentiation

Affiliations

alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase: expression levels of this novel cancer biomarker depend on tumor differentiation

Rainer Kuefer et al. Am J Pathol. 2002 Sep.

Abstract

alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) has previously been shown to be a highly sensitive marker for colorectal and clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, AMACR expression was down-regulated at the transcript and protein level in hormone-refractory metastatic PCa, suggesting a hormone-dependent expression of AMACR. To further explore the hypothesis that AMACR is hormone regulated and plays a role in PCa progression AMACR protein expression was characterized in a broad range of PCa samples treated with variable amounts and lengths of exogenous anti-androgens. Analysis included standard slides and high-density tissue microarrays. AMACR protein expression was significantly increased in localized hormone-naive PCa as compared to benign (P < 0.001). Mean AMACR expression was lower in tissue samples from patients who had received neoadjuvant hormone treatment but still higher compared to hormone-refractory metastases. The hormone-sensitive tumor cell line, LNCaP, demonstrated stronger AMACR expression by Western blot analysis than the poorly differentiated cell lines DU-145 and PC-3. AMACR protein expression in cells after exposure to anti-androgen treatment was unchanged, whereas prostate-specific antigen, known to be androgen-regulated, demonstrated decreased protein expression. Surprisingly, this data suggests that AMACR expression is not regulated by androgens. Examination of colorectal cancer, which is not hormone regulated, demonstrated high levels of AMACR expression in well to moderately differentiated tumors and weak expression in anaplastic colorectal cancers. Taken together, these data suggest that AMACR expression is not hormone-dependent but may in fact be a marker of tumor differentiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Seventy-six prostate tissue samples including benign prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia, localized PCa, and metastatic PCa, were analyzed using cDNA expression array analysis. Hierarchical clustering was performed, filtering for only those genes with at least a 1.5-fold expression difference compared to a pool of normal prostate. AMACR was one of the genes that was found to be significantly overexpressed in PCa. Data given are a measure of relative gene expression of AMACR in each sample. Red and green represent up- and down-regulation, respectively. Lighter shading correlates with increased expression.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A: AMACR protein expression in localized hormone-naive PCa. The specificity of AMACR is demonstrated by the near complete absence of AMACR expression in benign prostate glands (center). Error bars (right) representing the 95% CI of the mean expression level of AMACR for the four tissue types: benign prostate (benign), localized hormone-naive PCa (PCa), hormone-treated localized PCa (hPCa), and hormone-refractory distant PCa metastases (HR mets). B: Strong AMACR expression in a naive lymph node metastasis. Error bars (right) representing the 95% CI of the mean expression of the primary naive PCa and corresponding lymph node metastases. Original magnifications, ×400.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A: PCa demonstrating strong hormonal effect (right) because of anti-androgen treatment (H&E). Weak AMACR expression (middle) seen in the corresponding immunostained section. Comparison of the mean AMACR expression between PCa demonstrating minimal and strong hormonal effects by H&E examination (right, 95% CI). B: Left: Western blot analysis representing the baseline AMACR expression in different prostate cell lines. Internal loading control with β-tubulin. Right: Western blot analysis of LNCaP cells for AMACR and PSA expression after treatment with an androgen or an anti-androgen for 24 hours and 48 hours. Results of the nontreated control samples (C) and the hormone-treated (T) cells are shown. Original magnification, ×200 (A).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Top: AMACR expression in well-differentiated colon cancer. Cancer specificity demonstrated by the lack of staining in benign colonic glands (*). Middle: Weak AMACR expression in an anaplastic colon cancer case. Bottom: Weak AMACR expression in representative hormone-refractory PCa metastases. Original magnifications: ×400 (A, C); ×1000 (B); ×100 (D); ×200 (E and F).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennis LK, Resnick MI: Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Prostate 2000, 42:247-252 - PubMed
    1. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, Flanigan RC, deKernion JB, Ratliff TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, et al: Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994, 151:1283-1290 - PubMed
    1. Etzioni R, Legler JM, Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Cronin KA, Hankey BF: Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—part III: quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999, 91:1033-1039 - PubMed
    1. Maattanen L, Auvinen A, Stenman UH, Rannikko S, Tammela T, Aro J, Juusela H, Hakama M: European randomized study of prostate cancer screening: first-year results of the Finnish trial. Br J Cancer 1999, 79:1210-1214 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schroder FH, van der Maas P, Beemsterboer P, Kruger AB, Hoedemaeker R, Rietbergen J, Kranse R: Evaluation of the digital rectal examination as a screening test for prostate cancer. Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998, 90:1817-1823 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources