Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2002;62(13):1859-68.
doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262130-00003.

Management of bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients with diabetes mellitus

Affiliations
Review

Management of bacterial urinary tract infections in adult patients with diabetes mellitus

Ruby Meiland et al. Drugs. 2002.

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common and tend to have a more complicated course in patients with diabetes mellitus than in the general population. The mechanisms that potentially contribute to the increased prevalence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic bacteriuria in these patients are defects in the local urinary cytokine secretions and an increased adherence of the microorganisms to the uroepithelial cells. The need for treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria remains controversial. No evidence is available on the optimal treatment of acute cystitis and pyelonephritis in patients with diabetes. Because of the frequent (asymptomatic) upper tract involvement and the possible serious complications, many experts recommend a 7- to 14-day oral antibacterial regimen for bacterial cystitis in these patients, with an antibacterial agent that achieves high concentrations both in the urine and in urinary tract tissues. The recommended treatment of acute pyelonephritis does not differ from that in patients without diabetes. Clinical trials specifically dealing with the treatment of UTIs in patients with diabetes, comparing the optimal duration and choice of antibacterial agent, are needed. In addition, new approaches to preventive strategies must prove their value in this specific patient group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. JAMA. 1977 Oct 31;238(18):1924-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 28;329(18):1328-34 - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jun;23(6):722-3 - PubMed
    1. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;11(3):719-33 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Jul 3;285(6334):7-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances