Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 12216087
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10871
Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Background: A significant number of prostate adenocarcinoma patients undergoing radical prostatectomy are found to have microscopic extraprostatic disease extension. A majority of these patients have focal extraprostatic extension limited to one or both sides of the prostate. In addition, positive surgical margins are a common pathologic finding in this patient subgroup. In the current study, the authors evaluated the impact of positive surgical margins as an independent predictive factor for prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression in patients with pT3a/b N0M0 carcinoma.
Methods: The Mayo Clinic prostate cancer registry list provided 1202 patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma (no seminal vesicle or regional lymph node involvement) who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 1987-1995. To reduce confounding variables, patients who received preoperative therapy or adjuvant therapy were excluded, resulting in 842 patients who were eligible for analysis.
Results: A total of 354 patients (42%) had > or = 1 positive surgical margins whereas 488 patients (58%) demonstrated no margin involvement. The sites of margin positivity were as follows: apex (n = 163), base (n = 47), posterior prostate (n = 227), and anterior prostate (n = 11). A total of 111 patients had > or = 2 positive surgical margins. The 5-year survival free of clinical recurrence and/or biochemical failure (postoperative PSA level > 0.2 ng/mL) for patients with no positive surgical margins was 76% and was 65% for patients with 1 positive surgical margin (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in biochemical disease progression between patients with 1 versus those with > or = 2 surgical margins (65% vs. 62%). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margins were a significant predictor (P = 0.0017) of clinical disease recurrence and biochemical failure (relative risk, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.04) after controlling for preoperative PSA, Gleason score, and DNA ploidy.
Conclusions: In the current study, positive surgical margins were found to be a significant predictor of disease recurrence in patients with pT3a/b NO prostate carcinoma, a finding that is independent of PSA, Gleason score, and DNA ploidy. The benefit of adjuvant therapy in optimizing recurrence-free survival remains to be tested.
Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):733-9. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00450-0. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9372884
-
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20883488
-
Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):903-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169475.00949.78. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 16093984
-
Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):299-315. J Urol. 1998. PMID: 9679867 Review.
-
Risk factors for progression in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.Semin Urol Oncol. 1996 May;14(2 Suppl 2):12-20; discussion 21. Semin Urol Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8725887 Review.
Cited by
-
Combining high wavenumber and fingerprint Raman spectroscopy for the detection of prostate cancer during radical prostatectomy.Biomed Opt Express. 2018 Aug 15;9(9):4294-4305. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.004294. eCollection 2018 Sep 1. Biomed Opt Express. 2018. PMID: 30615702 Free PMC article.
-
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. PMID: 36859711 Free PMC article.
-
[(11)C]choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Jun;35(6):1065-73. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0716-2. Epub 2008 Jan 16. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18200444
-
Salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2003 Sep;21(4):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0360-1. Epub 2003 Aug 16. World J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12923657 Review.
-
Multi-parametric MRI of the prostate: Factors predicting extracapsular extension at the time of radical prostatectomy.Asian J Urol. 2017 Jan;4(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Nov 19. Asian J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29264204 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous