Towards an understanding of self-reports of sleep
- PMID: 12220319
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2002.00306.x
Towards an understanding of self-reports of sleep
Abstract
Sleep research has made extensive use of self-report measures relying on a response format that requires respondents to provide single, specific numerical estimates. The cognitive processes involved in storing and retrieving sleep-related information allow only approximate numeric estimates of sleep behavior. Based on a fuzzy set model of survey responses, a response format is proposed to better capture the inherent vagueness of quantitative estimates of sleep behavior. Ninety-three adults (mean age 29.3 years) participated in two interviews, 1 month apart, consisting of questions about health-related behaviors. Questions were asked in both traditional point estimate and fuzzy response formats. A subset of questions was repeated at the end of each interview to examine test-retest reliability. Subjects filled out daily diaries each morning during the month between interviews. Quantitative estimates of usual sleep behavior were found to be highly reliable. Point estimates differed significantly from fuzzy boundary estimates. Differences between lower and upper boundary estimates indicated substantial ranges in estimates of usual sleep: total sleep time (6-8.2 h), sleep latency (26-44 min), bed time (11:25 PM-12:56 AM) and waking time (7:24-8:39 AM). Mean diary-recorded bed and waking times fell between the lower and upper boundary estimates in more than 53% of cases, and between the lower and upper extreme estimates in more than 92% of cases. Fuzzy response formats provide an opportunity to report more completely what can be recalled about sleep behavior. They also provide a useful framework for better understand the meaning of traditional point estimate formats.
Similar articles
-
Improving self-reports of drug-use: numeric estimates as fuzzy sets.Addiction. 2003 Sep;98(9):1239-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00444.x. Addiction. 2003. PMID: 12930211
-
How Many Sleep Diary Entries Are Needed to Reliably Estimate Adolescent Sleep?Sleep. 2017 Mar 1;40(3):zsx006. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx006. Sleep. 2017. PMID: 28199718 Free PMC article.
-
The self-morningness/eveningness (Self-ME): An extremely concise and totally subjective assessment of diurnal preference.Chronobiol Int. 2015;32(9):1192-200. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1078807. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Chronobiol Int. 2015. PMID: 26453178
-
Measuring sleep habits without using a diary: the sleep timing questionnaire.Sleep. 2003 Mar 15;26(2):208-12. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.2.208. Sleep. 2003. PMID: 12683481
-
Objective measures of sleepiness and wakefulness: application to the real world?J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;23(1):39-49. doi: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000190416.62482.42. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16514350 Review.
Cited by
-
Predeployment Sleep Duration and Insomnia Symptoms as Risk Factors for New-Onset Mental Health Disorders Following Military Deployment.Sleep. 2013 Jul 1;36(7):1009-1018. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2798. Sleep. 2013. PMID: 23814337 Free PMC article.
-
Sleep Duration and Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;123(6):874-881. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.057. Epub 2018 Dec 18. Am J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30598240 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of child sleep diary questionnaire among junior high school children.J Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):1-4. doi: 10.2188/jea.14.1. J Epidemiol. 2004. PMID: 15065685 Free PMC article.
-
Deciphering the temporal link between pain and sleep in a heterogeneous chronic pain patient sample: a multilevel daily process study.Sleep. 2012 May 1;35(5):675-87A. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1830. Sleep. 2012. PMID: 22547894 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of a sleep quality questionnaire for use in epidemiologic studies.J Epidemiol. 2012;22(3):244-50. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20110107. Epub 2012 Feb 18. J Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22343331 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources