Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Jun;30(3):153-9.
doi: 10.1054/jcms.2002.0296.

2D- and 3D-based measurements of orbital floor fractures from CT scans

Affiliations
Comparative Study

2D- and 3D-based measurements of orbital floor fractures from CT scans

Oliver Ploder et al. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Two methods for area and volume calculation of the orbit were evaluated following blow-out fractures of the orbital floor using computed tomography (CT) scans.

Material and methods: Isolated blow-out fractures of the orbital floor in human cadavers were simulated by fracturing the orbital floor and placing a defined volume of silicone within each defect. The area of fracture and the volume of silicone simulating herniated periorbital tissue were evaluated in 16 orbits by the use of a three-dimensional (3D) CT-based software package (Analyze((R)); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) and software based on two-dimensional (2D) coronal CT scans. Both methods were compared with direct anatomical measurements and evaluated with Lin's concordance coefficient (rho(c)).

Results: Between-method concordance of area and volume calculation were rho(c)=0.962, and 0.872 for the 3D-CT-based method, and 0.981 and 0.952 for the 2D-CT method, respectively. The time allocated for measurement was significantly longer for the 3D-CT than for the 2D-CT method (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Calculations of blow-out fractures of the orbital floor by 3D-CT and 2D-CT method are accurate for assessing the area of fracture and the volume of herniated tissue. Lesser processing time and simple usage favour the 2D-CT-based calculation method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms