Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Sep-Oct;9(5):540-53.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1061.

Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration

Affiliations

Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration

Emily S Patterson et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: In addition to providing new capabilities, the introduction of technology in complex, sociotechnical systems, such as health care and aviation, can have unanticipated side effects on technical, social, and organizational dimensions. To identify potential accidents in the making, the authors looked for side effects from a natural experiment, the implementation of bar code medication administration (BCMA), a technology designed to reduce adverse drug events (ADEs).

Design: Cross-sectional observational study of medication passes before (21 hours of observation of 7 nurses at 1 hospital) and after (60 hours of observation of 26 nurses at 3 hospitals) BCMA implementation.

Measurements: Detailed, handwritten field notes of targeted ethnographic observations of in situ nurse-BCMA interactions were iteratively analyzed using process tracing and five conceptual frameworks.

Results: Ethnographic observations distilled into 67 nurse-BCMA interactions were classified into 12 categories. We identified five negative side effects after BCMA implementation: (1) nurses confused by automated removal of medications by BCMA, (2) degraded coordination between nurses and physicians, (3) nurses dropping activities to reduce workload during busy periods, (4) increased prioritization of monitored activities during goal conflicts, and (5) decreased ability to deviate from routine sequences.

Conclusion: These side effects might create new paths to ADEs. We recommend design revisions, modification of organizational policies, and "best practices" training that could potentially minimize or eliminate these side effects before they contribute to adverse outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary BCMA display for a fictional patient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Levels of abstraction in the process tracing analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of mini-case.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Interrup-tions during medication administration prior to BCMA.

References

    1. Doing What Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors and Their Impact. Report of the Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) to the President, February 2000. Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force. Washington, DC <http://www.quic.gov/report/toc.htm>.
    1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird NM, et al. The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients: Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(6):377–84. - PubMed
    1. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Newhouse JP, et al. Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry. 1999;36:255–64. - PubMed
    1. Leape L, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274:35–43. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, et al. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001; 8(4):299–308. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms