Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Oct;61(10):929-33.
doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.929.

Anti-Ro52 reactivity is an independent and additional serum marker in connective tissue disease

Affiliations

Anti-Ro52 reactivity is an independent and additional serum marker in connective tissue disease

I Peene et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether anti-Ro52 is an independent serum marker in connective tissue disease.

Methods: Over a two year period, 1727 consecutive antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive serum samples were analysed in parallel by double immunodiffusion with thymus/spleen nuclear extract and by line immunoassay with recombinant Ro52, recombinant La/SSB, and natural Ro60. Sera that were only reactive towards Ro52 were further analysed by a variety of additional anti-SSA/Ro detection methods and by specific anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 assays. Natural purified SSA/Ro was analysed by immunoblot and protein sequencing.

Results: Analysis of natural purified SSA/Ro (Immunovision, Springdale, AR) showed only Ro60 and no immunoreactive Ro52. Consequently, assays based on this substrate only identify sera with anti-Ro60 reactivity. Twenty serum samples showed anti-Ro52 without anti-Ro60 and anti-SSB/La on line immunoassay. By additional testing, 2/20 sera were found positive for anti-Ro60 reactivity. The remaining 18 sera were not identified by any of the classical anti-SSA/Ro assays and were considered to be reactive only with Ro52 and not with Ro60. This anti-Ro52 reactivity was confirmed by natural and recombinant Ro52 in 16/18 cases. 12/18 sera corresponded to connective tissue diseases.

Conclusion: Anti-Ro52 positive sera without any evidence of anti-Ro60 and anti-La/SSB reactivity can be considered as an independent group that is systematically missed by classical anti-SSA/Ro detection methods owing to a bias towards anti-Ro60 reactivity. The anti-Ro52 sera are precipitin negative, not retrieved by SSA/Ro enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on natural SSA/Ro, and show no specific ANA fluorescence staining pattern. These findings together with the clinical data indicate that anti-Ro52 should be considered as an additional and independent serum marker.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of natural purified SSA/Ro (Immunovision). No Ro52 was detected on immunoblot using different reagents. Reference serum with anti-Ro60 and high titre of anti-Ro52 antibodies (lane +). Control serum negative for anti-SSA (lane C). Blank control (lane B). Monoclonal anti-Ro60 antibody (lane mAb a-Ro60). Monoclonal anti-Ro52 antibody (lane mAb a-Ro52). Coomassie brilliant blue staining of natural purified SSA/Ro and protein sequencing of the 42 kDa band shows three peptides attributable to Ro60 (lane CBB). Reactivity of the monoclonal anti-Ro52 antibody in western immunoblot was confirmed (see fig 2, lane mAb a-Ro52).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Confirmation of anti-Ro52 reactivity by HeLa-S100 immunoblot. Four sera reactive with Ro52 on line immunoassay (Lane 10417, 8990, 10746, 14216) (top) without detectable anti-Ro60 and anti-La/SSB antibodies. Confirmation of this anti-Ro52 reactivity by HeLa-S100 immunoblot (bottom). Monoclonal anti-Ro60 antibody (lane mAb a-Ro60). Monoclonal anti-Ro52 antibody (lane mAb a-Ro52). Monoclonal anti-SSB antibody (lane mAb a-SSB).

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms