Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2002 Aug;50(8):330-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF03032626.

Urgent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Urgent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Hitoshi Hirose et al. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become widespread, since it has proven less invasive and to promote early recovery. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of off-pump CABG in patients in the evolving phase of acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: Retrospective chart review was carried out for patients undergoing urgent isolated off-pump and on-pump CABG at Shin-Tokyo Hospital Group between January 1991 and June 2001. The patients' demographic, operative data, and postoperative results were collected.

Results: The off-pump group consisted of 19 males and 11 females with a mean age of 72.0 years and the on-pump group of 91 males and 38 females with a mean age of 64.3 years. Preoperative use of intraaortic balloon pumping and preoperative shock was more frequently observed in the on-pump group. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.1 +/- 0.9 in the off-pump group and 3.2 +/- 1.1 in the on-pump group (p = NS). Intubation time (18.5 vs 32.9 hours), ICU stay (3.4 vs 4.9 days), and postoperative stay (13.5 vs 24.3 days) were significantly shorter in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group (P < 0.05). The frequency of the major complications was significantly lower in the off-pump group (9/30, 30%) than the on-pump group (65/129, 50.4%), especially for postoperative low output syndrome (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the recovery period by use of off-pump CABG. Early follow-up results were similar between the two groups, in terms of late cardiac events and survival.

Conclusion: Urgent off-pump CABG is safe and provides early recovery, provided that the patient's intraoperative hemodynamics are taken into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Dec;72(6):2013-9 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Feb;4(1):23-7 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983 Apr;85(4):485-91 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984 Dec;88(6):914-21 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Aug;66(2):576-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources